Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
A Prospective Multi-Institutional Phase I/II Trial of Step-Wise Dose-per-Fraction Escalation in Low and Intermediate Risk Prostate Cancer.
Ritter, Mark A; Kupelian, Patrick A; Petereit, Daniel G; Lawton, Colleen A; Anger, Nick; Geye, Heather; Chappell, Richard J; Forman, Jeffrey D.
Afiliação
  • Ritter MA; Department of Human Oncology, University of Wisconsin Carbone Cancer Center, Madison, Wisconsin. Electronic address: ritter@humonc.wisc.edu.
  • Kupelian PA; UCLA Medical Center, Los Angeles, California.
  • Petereit DG; John T. Vucurevich Cancer Center Institute, Rapid City, South Dakota.
  • Lawton CA; Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin.
  • Anger N; Department of Human Oncology, University of Wisconsin Carbone Cancer Center, Madison, Wisconsin.
  • Geye H; Department of Human Oncology, University of Wisconsin Carbone Cancer Center, Madison, Wisconsin.
  • Chappell RJ; Department of Biostatistics and Medical Informatics and Department of Statistics, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin.
  • Forman JD; Karmanos Cancer Institute, Detroit, Michigan.
Pract Radiat Oncol ; 10(5): 345-353, 2020.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32169590
PURPOSE: This phase I/II, multi-institutional trial explored the tolerance and efficacy of stepwise increasing hypofractionation (HPFX) radiation therapy regimens for fraction sizes up to 4.3 Gy in localized prostate cancer. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Three escalating dose-per-fraction schedules were designed to yield similar predicted tumor control while maintaining equivalent predicted late toxicity. HPFX levels I, II, and III were carried out sequentially and delivered schedules of 64.7 Gy/22 fx/2.94 Gy, 58.08 Gy/16 fx/3.63 Gy, and 51.6 Gy/12 fx/4.3 Gy, respectively with next level escalations contingent upon acceptable gastrointestinal (GI) toxicity. The primary endpoints were biochemical control and toxicity. RESULTS: A total of 347 patients were recruited by 5 institutions with 101, 111, and 135 patients treated on HPFX levels I, II, and III with median follow-ups of 100, 85.5, and 61.7 months, respectively (83.2 months combined). The National Comprehensive Cancer Network low- or intermediate-risk group distribution was 46% and 54%, respectively. Sixteen percent of patients, primarily intermediate risk, received 6 months of androgen deprivation therapy. The 8-year nadir + 2 actuarial biochemical control rates for HPFX levels I, II, and III were 91.1% ± 3.0%, 92.7% ± 2.7%, and 88.5% ± 4.6%, respectively (Kaplan-Meier log rank, 0.903). Among clinical covariates, only Gleason score reached near significance in multivariate analysis (P = .054). Twenty-six patients failed biochemically (crude incidence of 7.5%), and there were 5 cause-specific deaths. GI and genitourinary toxicities were acceptable and similar across the 3 HPFX levels. The combined actuarial cumulative incidence of grade 2+ GI and genitourinary toxicities at 7 years were 16.3% ± 2.1% and 22.1% ± 2.4%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: HPFX employing fraction sizes extending into the 3.6 to 4.3 Gy/fraction range can be delivered with excellent oncologic outcomes. Such schedules, positioned between moderate and ultra-HPFX, may provide additional options for patients wishing to avoid prolonged treatment schedules associated with conventionally fractionated radiation therapy for prostate cancer.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Etiology_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Aged / Aged80 / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Etiology_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Aged / Aged80 / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article