Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
A case report: upgrade to cardiac resynchronization therapy with a blocked persistent left-sided superior vena cava.
Abdalwahid, Kawan Fadhil; Chu, Gavin S; Nicolson, William B.
Afiliação
  • Abdalwahid KF; Department of Cardiology, Glenfield Hospital, Glenfield Hospital, Groby Road, LE3 9QP Leicester, UK.
  • Chu GS; Department of Cardiology, Glenfield Hospital, Glenfield Hospital, Groby Road, LE3 9QP Leicester, UK.
  • Nicolson WB; Department of Cardiovascular Sciences, University of Leicester, University Road, LE1 7RH Leicester, UK.
Eur Heart J Case Rep ; 4(2): 1-5, 2020 Apr.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32352067
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Pacemaker-induced cardiomyopathy (PICM) can occur in up to 9% of patients having a pacemaker. Pacemaker-induced cardiomyopathy can be treated by upgrade to a biventricular pacemaker with a left ventricular (LV) lead implantation. The procedure can be technically challenging in patients with persistent left-sided superior vena cava (PLSVC). CASE

SUMMARY:

We report the case of a 72-year-old gentleman with a PLSVC, who had a dual-chamber pacemaker implanted 15 years ago for complete heart block. After 12 years of good health, the gentleman developed breathlessness due to PICM. At upgrade to biventricular pacemaker, his coronary sinus was found to be occluded and a collateral branch was used to successfully position an LV lead. Marked clinical improvement was seen before representation with syncope after 2 years due to simultaneous failure of both LV and right ventricular leads. Subsequently, a right-sided de novo biventricular pacemaker was implanted. In this instance, the PLSVC was beneficial because it isolated the existing leads from the new implant, thereby reducing the risk of SVC obstruction.

DISCUSSION:

Although implantation of pacemaker leads through a PLSVC constitutes a challenging procedure due to manoeuvring difficulties of the pacing leads into the cardiac chambers, in this particular case, the presence of PLSVC was beneficial because it meant that no leads were present in the true SVC, reducing the risk of occlusion and avoiding the need for lead extraction.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article