Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Learning Spinal Manipulation: Objective and Subjective Assessment of Performance.
Pasquier, Mégane; Chéron, Charlène; Barbier, Gaëtan; Dugas, Claude; Lardon, Arnaud; Descarreaux, Martin.
Afiliação
  • Pasquier M; Institut Franco-Européen de Chiropraxie, Toulouse, France; Department of Anatomy, Université du Québec à Trois-Rivières, Trois Rivières, Québec, Canada. Electronic address: mpasquier@ifec.net.
  • Chéron C; Institut Franco-Européen de Chiropraxie, Toulouse, France.
  • Barbier G; Institut Franco-Européen de Chiropraxie, Toulouse, France.
  • Dugas C; Université du Québec à Trois-Rivières, Trois Rivières, Québec, Canada.
  • Lardon A; Institut Franco-Européen de Chiropraxie, Toulouse, France; CIAMS, University of Paris-Sud, University of Paris-Saclay, France.
  • Descarreaux M; Université du Québec à Trois-Rivières, Trois Rivières, Québec, Canada.
J Manipulative Physiol Ther ; 43(3): 189-196, 2020.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32951767
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE:

The purpose of this study was to investigate associations between objective spinal manipulation therapy (SMT) biomechanical parameters and subjective assessments provided by patients, clinicians, and expert assessors.

METHODS:

Chiropractic students (N = 137) and expert instructors (N = 14) were recruited. Students were asked to perform a thoracic SMT alternately on each other on a force-sensing table while being observed by an expert instructor. Students who performed (clinicians) and received (patients) SMT, and expert instructors, independently scored each SMT performance using visual analog scales. Correlations between these subjective scores and SMT biomechanical parameters were calculated. The following parameters were evaluated peak force, preload force, thrust duration, and drop in preload force. Spinal manipulation therapy comfort was also assessed by patients, clinicians, and expert instructors.

RESULTS:

Results of the study indicate that thrust duration assessed by instructors and patients was the only parameters significantly correlated with the table data (r = .37; P < .001 and r = .26; P = .002). Comfort assessed by clinicians was significantly correlated with their own assessments of thrust duration (r = .37; P < .001) and preload force (r = .23; P = .007), whereas comfort assessed by instructors was significantly correlated with their own assessment of thrust duration (r = .27; P = .002) and drop in preload force (r = -.34; P < .001). Objective biomechanical parameters of performance did not predict perceived comfort.

CONCLUSIONS:

Overall, the results from the subjective assessments of SMT performance are weakly correlated with objective measures of SMT performance. Only the thrust duration evaluated by expert instructors and patients was associated with scores obtained from the table. Perceived comfort of the procedure seems to be associated mostly with perceived thrust duration and preload characteristics.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Evaluation_studies / Prognostic_studies Limite: Adult / Female / Humans / Male Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Evaluation_studies / Prognostic_studies Limite: Adult / Female / Humans / Male Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article