Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Cervical dilatation and preparation prior to outpatient hysteroscopy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
De Silva, P M; Wilson, L; Carnegy, A; Smith, P P; Clark, T J.
Afiliação
  • De Silva PM; Institute of Clinical Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
  • Wilson L; School of Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.
  • Carnegy A; Queen Elizabeth Hospital, University of Birmingham Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK.
  • Smith PP; Institute of Metabolism and Systems Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
  • Clark TJ; Birmingham Women's and Children's NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK.
BJOG ; 128(7): 1112-1123, 2021 06.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33219606
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

There are uncertainties about the benefit of routine cervical preparation and/or cervical dilatation before outpatient hysteroscopy.

OBJECTIVE:

To determine if cervical preparation and/or routine mechanical dilatation reduces pain during outpatient hysteroscopy. SEARCH STRATEGY MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL and CENTRAL were searched on 19 October 2020, using keywords 'hysteroscopy', 'cervical preparation', 'cervical ripening', 'cervical dilatation', 'outpatient', 'office' and/or 'ambulatory' and associated medical subject headings. SELECTION CRITERIA Randomised controlled trials investigating the benefit of cervical preparation and/or cervical dilatation on pain in women undergoing outpatient hysteroscopy were included. DATA COLLECTION AND

ANALYSIS:

Two independent reviewers selected eligible trials and extracted data on pain, feasibility, adverse events and satisfaction/acceptability for meta-analysis. MAIN

RESULTS:

The literature search yielded 807 records, of which 24 were included for review and 19 provided data for meta-analysis. No trials investigated the role of routine mechanical cervical dilatation. Cervical preparation significantly reduced pain during outpatient hysteroscopy; standard mean difference (SMD) -0.67, 95% confidence interval (CI) -1.05 to -0.29. Feasibility also improved as priming provided significantly easier hysteroscopic entry (SMD 0.89, 95% CI 0.32-1.46), greater cervical dilatation (SMD 0.81, 95% CI 0.08-1.53) and shorter procedural times (SMD -0.51, 95% CI -0.88 to -0.13). Cervical preparation, however, incurred significantly more adverse effects, mainly comprising genital tract bleeding, abdominal pain and gastrointestinal symptoms (odds ratio 2.94, 95% CI 1.58-5.47). There were limited data regarding satisfaction, acceptability and complications.

CONCLUSIONS:

Cervical preparation reduces pain and improves feasibility associated with outpatient hysteroscopy but increases the risk of adverse effects. TWEETABLE ABSTRACT Cervical preparation before outpatient hysteroscopy reduces pain, enhances feasibility but increases adverse effects.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Etiology_studies / Systematic_reviews Limite: Female / Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Etiology_studies / Systematic_reviews Limite: Female / Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article