Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Propofol Target-Controlled Infusion in Emergency Department Sedation (ProTEDS): a multicentre, single-arm feasibility study.
Burton, Fiona Marie; Lowe, David John; Millar, Jonathan; Corfield, Alasdair R; Watson, Malcolm J; Sim, Malcolm A B.
Afiliação
  • Burton FM; Emergency Department, Hairmyres Hospital, East Kilbride, South Lanarkshire, UK fiona.burton@glasgow.ac.uk.
  • Lowe DJ; Glasgow University Section of Anaesthesia, Pain and Critical Care, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.
  • Millar J; Emergency Department, Queen Elizabeth University Hospital, Glasgow, UK.
  • Corfield AR; Department of Anaesthesia and Critical Care, Queen Elizabeth University Hospital, Glasgow, UK.
  • Watson MJ; Emergency Department, Royal Alexandra Hospital, Paisley, Renfrewshire, UK.
  • Sim MAB; Department of Anaesthesia and Critical Care, Queen Elizabeth University Hospital, Glasgow, UK.
Emerg Med J ; 38(3): 205-210, 2021 Mar.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33298604
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Procedural sedation is a core skill of the emergency physician. Bolus administration of propofol is widely used in UK EDs. Titrated to an end point of sedation, it has a rapid effect but has been associated with adverse incidents. The use of a target-controlled infusion (TCI) of propofol is not routine but may reduce the incidence of adverse incidents.The primary aims of this single-arm feasibility study were patient satisfaction and to establish recruitment rates for a randomised controlled trial comparing propofol TCI to bolus administration.

METHODS:

Four EDs in Scotland, UK, participated. Patients aged 18-65 years, with anterior shoulder dislocation, weight ≥ 50kg, fasted ≥ 90 min were screened. Patients underwent reduction of their dislocated shoulder using TCI propofol. The primary end point was patient satisfaction recorded on a Visual Analogue Scale.

RESULTS:

Between 3 April 2017 and 31 December 2018, 25 patients were recruited with a recruitment rate of 20% for the 16-month recruitment window, with a temporary pause to allow amendment of drug dosage.Two patients were excluded. Twenty achieved adequate sedation, defined as a Modified Observer's Assessment of Alertness/Sedation Scale (OAA/S) 3. Successful reduction was achieved in all adequately sedated. Patient satisfaction was documented in 14 patients, mean±SD of 97±9 and time to sedation was 25±8 min. No adverse events were recorded using the Society of Intravenous Anaesthesia adverse event reporting tool.

CONCLUSION:

Propofol TCI was acceptable as a method of procedural sedation for patients. The lower than expected recruitment rates highlight the need for dedicated research support. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER NCT03442803.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials Limite: Adolescent / Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials Limite: Adolescent / Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article