Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Budget Impact Associated with the Introduction of the Impella 5.0® Mechanical Circulatory Support Device for Cardiogenic Shock in France.
Le Guyader, Alexandre; Pernot, Mathieu; Delmas, Clément; Roze, Stéphane; Fau, Isabelle; Flecher, Erwan; Lebreton, Guillaume.
Afiliação
  • Le Guyader A; Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Dupuytren University Hospital, Limoges, France.
  • Pernot M; Department of Cardiology and Cardio-Vascular Surgery, Haut-Lévèque University Hospital, Bordeaux, France.
  • Delmas C; Cardiology Department, Rangueil University Hospital, Toulouse, France.
  • Roze S; Vyoo Agency, Lyon, France.
  • Fau I; SGE Consulting, Paris, France.
  • Flecher E; Department of Cardio-Thoracic and Vascular Surgery, Pontchaillou University Hospital, Rennes, France.
  • Lebreton G; Cardiac Surgery Department, Pitié-Salpétrière Hospital, Sorbonne University, Paris, France.
Clinicoecon Outcomes Res ; 13: 53-63, 2021.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33500641
AIM: Cardiogenic shock (CS), if not diagnosed and treated rapidly, can lead to irreversible multiorgan damage and death. An economic analysis was conducted to determine the budget impact of the introduction of Impella 5.0®, a mechanical circulatory support (MCS) device that directly unloads the left ventricle, into clinical practice in patients with left ventricular CS in France. METHODS: A budget impact model was developed to compare the cost of Impella 5.0 with veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO) from the perspective of the French national healthcare insurer. Costs associated with Impella 5.0, plus complication-related costs for VA-ECMO or Impella 5.0 from 2019 were included and clinical input data relating to complication rates and time spent on device were sourced from published literature. Extensive scenario and one-way deterministic sensitivity analyses were performed to explore the influence of uncertainty around key input parameters. RESULTS: Over a time horizon of 5 years, the introduction of Impella 5.0 was associated with cumulative savings of EUR 4.3 million. The results were driven by the lower risk of device-related complications associated with Impella 5.0. Savings were apparent from Year 1 onwards, with savings in excess of EUR 375,000 projected in Year 1 alone. On a per-patient level, in Year 1, estimated savings with the introduction of Impella 5.0 totaled EUR 616 per patient. Sensitivity analyses showed that the findings of the analysis were robust. CONCLUSION: The Impella 5.0 device was associated with cumulative cost savings in excess of EUR 4 million over a 5-year period compared with current practice. Projected savings were driven by a lower rate of device-related complications with Impella 5.0 compared with VA-ECMO.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Health_economic_evaluation / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Health_economic_evaluation / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article