Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Accidental boosting in an individual with tetraplegia - considerations for the interpretation of cardiopulmonary exercise testing.
Nightingale, Tom E; Eginyan, Gevorg; Balthazaar, Shane J T; Williams, Alison M M; Lam, Tania; Krassioukov, Andrei V.
Afiliação
  • Nightingale TE; School of Sport, Exercise and Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
  • Eginyan G; International Collaboration on Repair Discoveries (ICORD), Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia (UBC), Vancouver, Canada.
  • Balthazaar SJT; Division of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.
  • Williams AMM; International Collaboration on Repair Discoveries (ICORD), Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia (UBC), Vancouver, Canada.
  • Lam T; School of Kinesiology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.
  • Krassioukov AV; International Collaboration on Repair Discoveries (ICORD), Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia (UBC), Vancouver, Canada.
J Spinal Cord Med ; 45(6): 969-974, 2022 Nov.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33513073
CONTEXT: Autonomic dysreflexia (AD), characterized by a transient increase in systolic blood pressure (BP), is experienced by individuals with spinal cord injury (SCI) and can be purposefully induced ('boosting') to counteract autonomic dysfunction that impairs cardiovascular responses to exercise. Herein, we demonstrate the impact of unintentional boosting observed during cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) in an inactive male with SCI (C5, motor-complete). FINDINGS: On two separate occasions the individual performed a standard arm-crank CPET (1-min stages, 7W increase in resistance) following by a longer CPET (4-min stages, 12W increase in resistance), both to volitional exhaustion. The second CPET was performed to confirm the accuracy of exercise intensity prescription and verify peak exercise parameters. Immediately following the second CPET on the initial visit, the individual reported symptoms of AD, verified as a 58mmHg increase in systolic BP from baseline. Relative to the first CPET, performed only 35 min earlier, there were pronounced differences in peak exercise responses. In comparison to the longer CPET performed on the second visit without a concomitant episode of AD (thereby controlling for the type of CPET protocol administered), peak exercise outcomes were considerably elevated: power output (Δ19W), oxygen uptake (Δ3.61 ml·â€…kg·-1min-1), ventilation (Δ11.4 L ·min-1) and heart rate (Δ9 b·min-1). CONCLUSION/CLINICAL RELEVANCE: This case raises important considerations around the nuances of CPET in this population. In individuals susceptible to BP instability, the physiologically boosted state may explain a significant proportion of the variance in peak aerobic capacity and should be closely monitored before and after clinical CPET.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Etiology_studies / Guideline Limite: Humans / Male Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Etiology_studies / Guideline Limite: Humans / Male Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article