Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Integrating explanation and prediction in computational social science.
Hofman, Jake M; Watts, Duncan J; Athey, Susan; Garip, Filiz; Griffiths, Thomas L; Kleinberg, Jon; Margetts, Helen; Mullainathan, Sendhil; Salganik, Matthew J; Vazire, Simine; Vespignani, Alessandro; Yarkoni, Tal.
Afiliação
  • Hofman JM; Microsoft Research, New York, NY, USA. jmh@microsoft.com.
  • Watts DJ; Department of Computer and Information Science, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA. djwatts@seas.upenn.edu.
  • Athey S; The Annenberg School of Communication, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA. djwatts@seas.upenn.edu.
  • Garip F; Operations, Information, and Decisions Department, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA. djwatts@seas.upenn.edu.
  • Griffiths TL; Graduate School of Business, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.
  • Kleinberg J; Department of Sociology, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, USA.
  • Margetts H; Department of Psychology, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, USA.
  • Mullainathan S; Department of Computer Science, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, USA.
  • Salganik MJ; Department of Computer Science, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, USA.
  • Vazire S; Department of Information Science, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, USA.
  • Vespignani A; Oxford Internet Institute, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
  • Yarkoni T; Public Policy Programme, The Alan Turing Institute, London, UK.
Nature ; 595(7866): 181-188, 2021 07.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34194044
Computational social science is more than just large repositories of digital data and the computational methods needed to construct and analyse them. It also represents a convergence of different fields with different ways of thinking about and doing science. The goal of this Perspective is to provide some clarity around how these approaches differ from one another and to propose how they might be productively integrated. Towards this end we make two contributions. The first is a schema for thinking about research activities along two dimensions-the extent to which work is explanatory, focusing on identifying and estimating causal effects, and the degree of consideration given to testing predictions of outcomes-and how these two priorities can complement, rather than compete with, one another. Our second contribution is to advocate that computational social scientists devote more attention to combining prediction and explanation, which we call integrative modelling, and to outline some practical suggestions for realizing this goal.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article