Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Ideal Nozzle Position During Pressurized Intraperitoneal Aerosol Chemotherapy in an Ex Vivo Model.
Piao, Jinlan; Park, Soo Jin; Lee, Heesu; Kim, Junsik; Park, Sunwoo; Lee, Nara; Kim, Se Ik; Lee, Maria; Song, Gwonhwa; Lee, Jung Chan; Kim, Hee Seung.
Afiliação
  • Piao J; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
  • Park SJ; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
  • Lee H; Interdisciplinary Program in Bioengineering, Seoul National University Graduate School, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
  • Kim J; Interdisciplinary Program in Bioengineering, Seoul National University Graduate School, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
  • Park S; Department of Plant & Biomaterials Science, Gyeongsang National University, Jinju-si, Republic of Korea.
  • Lee N; Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, CHA Gangnam Medical Center, CHA University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
  • Kim SI; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
  • Lee M; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
  • Song G; Institute of Animal Molecular Biotechnology and Department of Biotechnology, College of Life Sciences and Biotechnology, Korea University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
  • Lee JC; Department of Biomedical Engineering, Seoul National University College of Medicine, and Institute of Medical and Biological Engineering, Medical Research Center, Seoul National University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
  • Kim HS; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea; bboddi0311@gmail.com.
Anticancer Res ; 41(11): 5489-5498, 2021 Nov.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34732419
BACKGROUND/AIM: Pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy (PIPAC) is known to show uneven distribution and penetration of agents based on the nozzle position. Thus, this study aimed to investigate the ideal nozzle position for maximizing drug delivery during PIPAC. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We created 2 cm-, 4 cm- and 8 cm-ex vivo models according to the distance from the bottom to the nozzle using 21×15×16 cm-sized sealable plastic boxes. After each set of eight normal peritoneal tissues from swine were placed at eight different points (A to H), we performed PIPAC, compared the methylene blue staining areas to investigate the distribution, and estimated the depth of concentrated diffusion (DCD) and the depth of maximal diffusion (DMD) of doxorubicin. RESULTS: In terms of distribution, the 4 cm- and 8 cm-ex vivo models showed more stained faces than the 2 cm-ex vivo model. Regarding the penetration depth, the 4 cm- ex vivo model showed the highest DCD (mean; 244.1 µm, C; 105.1 µm, D; 80.9 µm, E; 250.2 µm, G; 250.2 µm, H) and DMD (mean; 174.8 µm, D; 162.7 µm, E; 511.7 µm, F; 522.2 µm, G; 528.1 µm, H) in the most points corresponding to 62.5%. CONCLUSION: The ideal nozzle position during PIPAC might be halfway between the nozzle inlet and the bottom in the ex vivo model.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Limite: Animals Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Limite: Animals Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article