Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Segmentation of endothelial cells of the cornea from the distance map of confocal microscope images.
Herrera-Pereda, Raidel; Crispi, Alberto Taboada; Babin, Danilo; Philips, Wilfried.
Afiliação
  • Herrera-Pereda R; Departamento de Bioinformática, Facultad de Ciencias y Tecnologías Computacionales, Universidad de las Ciencias Informáticas (UCI), Carretera a San Antonio de los Baños Km 2 ½, Torrens, Boyeros, La Habana, Cuba; TELIN-IPI, Ghent University - imec, Belgium. Electronic address: Raidel.HerreraPereda@UG
  • Crispi AT; Centro de Investigaciones de la Informática, Universidad Central "Marta Abreu" de Las Villas (UCLV), Carretera a Camajuaní, km 5 ½, Santa Clara, VC, CP 54830, Cuba.
  • Babin D; TELIN-IPI, Ghent University - imec, Belgium.
  • Philips W; TELIN-IPI, Ghent University - imec, Belgium.
Comput Biol Med ; 139: 104953, 2021 12.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34735943
We propose a novel algorithm for segmenting cells of the cornea endothelium layer on confocal microscope images. To get an inter-cellular space with minimum gray-scale value and to enhance cell borders, we apply a difference of Gaussian filter before image binarization by thresholding with the minimum gray-scale value. Removal of segmented noise and artifacts is performed by automatic thresholding (using an image frequency analysis to obtain a global threshold value per image). Final segmentation of cells is achieved by fitting the largest inscribed circles into the centers of cell regions defined by the distance map of the binary images. Parameters of interest such as cell count and density, pleomorphism, polymegathism, and F-measure are computed on a publicly available data-set (Confocal Corneal Endothelial Microscopy Data Set - Rotterdam Ophthalmic Data Repository) and compared against the results of the segmentation methods included with the data set, and the results of state of the art automatic methods. The obtained results achieve higher accuracy compared to the results of the segmentation included with the data set (e.g., -proposed versus dataset in R2 and mean relative error-, cell count: 0.823, - 0.241 versus 0.017, 0.534; cell density: 0.933, - 0.067 versus 0.154, 0.639; cell polymegathism: 0.652, - 0.079 versus 0.075, 0.886; cell pleomorphism: 0.242, - 0.128 versus 0.0352, - 0.222, respectively), and are in good agreement with the results of the state of the art method.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article