Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
A Clinical Tool to Guide Selection and Utilization of Marginal Donor Livers With Graft Steatosis in Liver Transplantation.
Steggerda, Justin A; Borja-Cacho, Daniel; Brennan, Todd V; Todo, Tsuyoshi; Nissen, Nicholas N; Bloom, Matthew B; Klein, Andrew S; Kim, Irene K.
Afiliação
  • Steggerda JA; Division of Transplantation, Department of Surgery, Northwestern Memorial Hospital, Chicago, IL.
  • Borja-Cacho D; Division of Transplantation, Department of Surgery, Northwestern Memorial Hospital, Chicago, IL.
  • Brennan TV; Division of Transplantation, Department of Surgery, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA.
  • Todo T; Division of Transplantation, Department of Surgery, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA.
  • Nissen NN; Division of Transplantation, Department of Surgery, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA.
  • Bloom MB; Division of Trauma and Critical Care Surgery, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA.
  • Klein AS; Division of Transplantation, Department of Surgery, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA.
  • Kim IK; Division of Transplantation, Department of Surgery, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA.
Transplant Direct ; 8(2): e1280, 2022 Feb.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35047662
BACKGROUND: Donor liver biopsy (DLBx) in liver transplantation provides information on allograft quality; however, predicting outcomes from these allografts remains difficult. METHODS: Between 2006 and 2015, 16 691 transplants with DLBx were identified from the Standard Transplant Analysis and Research database. Cox proportional hazard regression analyses identified donor and recipient characteristics associated with 30-d, 90-d, 1-y, and 3-y graft survival. A composite model, the Liver Transplant After Biopsy (LTAB) score, was created. The Mini-LTAB was then derived consisting of only donor age, macrosteatosis on DLBx, recipient model for end-stage liver disease score, and cold ischemic time. Risk groups were identified for each score and graft survival was evaluated. P values <0.05 were considered significant. RESULTS: The LTAB model used 14 variables and 5 risk groups and identified low-, mild-, moderate-, high-, and severe-risk groups. Compared with moderate-risk recipients, severe-risk recipients had increased risk of graft loss at 30 d (hazard ratio, 3.270; 95% confidence interval, 2.568-4.120) and at 1 y (2.258; 1.928-2.544). The Mini-LTAB model identified low-, moderate-, and high-risk groups. Graft survival in Mini-LTAB high-risk transplants was significantly lower than moderate- or low-risk transplants at all time points. CONCLUSIONS: The LTAB and Mini-LTAB scores represent guiding principles and provide clinically useful tools for the successful selection and utilization of marginal allografts in liver transplantation.

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Prognostic_studies Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Prognostic_studies Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article