Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Effects of decisional conflict, decision regret and self-stigma on quality of life for breast cancer survivors: A cross-sectional, multisite study in China.
Zhuang, Hezhu; Wang, Ling; Yu, Xuefen; Chan, Sally Wai-Chi; Gao, Yixuan; Li, Xiuqing; Gao, Shan; Zhu, Jiemin.
Afiliação
  • Zhuang H; The First Affiliated Hospital, Fujian Medical University, Fujian Province, P. R. China.
  • Wang L; Shenzhen Hospital, Peking University, Guangdong Province, P. R. China.
  • Yu X; Women and Children's Hospital, School of Medicine, Xiamen University, Xiamen, China.
  • Chan SW; President Office, Tung Wah College, Hong Kong.
  • Gao Y; Women and Children's Hospital, School of Medicine, Xiamen University, Xiamen, China.
  • Li X; Women and Children's Hospital, School of Medicine, Xiamen University, Xiamen, China.
  • Gao S; Shenzhen Hospital, Peking University, Guangdong Province, P. R. China.
  • Zhu J; Department of Nursing, School of Medicine, Xiamen University, Fujian Province, P. R. China.
J Adv Nurs ; 78(10): 3261-3272, 2022 Oct.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35396872
ABSTRACT

AIMS:

To examine the differences in decisional conflict, decision regret, self-stigma and quality of life among breast cancer survivors who chose different surgeries, as well as the effects of decisional conflict, decision regret and self-stigma on quality of life.

DESIGN:

Observational study.

METHODS:

Paper and online surveys were used to collect data from March to September 2020. The Chinese version of the Decisional Conflict Scale, Decision Regret Scale, Self-Stigma Form and Functional Assessment of Cancer Treatment-B were used to measure the corresponding health outcomes for breast cancer survivors who chose different surgeries from three university-affiliated hospitals. One-way analysis of variance, Pearson's correlation coefficient and hierarchical multiple regression analysis were used for data analysis.

RESULTS:

Among the 448 participants, only 21% chose breast conservative surgery, while 79% chose mastectomy with or without reconstruction. Women who chose mastectomy with reconstruction reported higher decisional conflict (p = .028) and more decision regret (p = .013) than women who chose breast conservative surgery; women who chose mastectomy without reconstruction indicated higher decisional conflict (p = .015), more decision regret (p < .001), and higher self-stigma (p = .034) than women who chose breast conservative surgery. Decisional conflict (r = -.430), decision regret (r = -.495), and self-stigma (r = -.561) were negatively correlated with quality of life. After controlling for sociodemographic and clinical variables, decisional conflict and decision regret explained 19.7% and self-stigma explained 12.9% of the variance in quality of life.

CONCLUSION:

Decisional conflict, decision regret and self-stigma vary according to different breast surgeries and are greatly associated with the quality of life of breast cancer survivors. IMPACT Future studies are warranted to investigate the decision-making process and the underlying reasons for surgical choices. Decision support strategies pre-surgery are needed to inform women about the risks and benefits of surgery options. Moreover, psychosocial support post-surgery is warranted to relieve women's self-stigma, thus improving their quality of life.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Observational_studies / Prevalence_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Female / Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Observational_studies / Prevalence_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Female / Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article