Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Remote Follow-Up Technologies in Traumatic Brain Injury: A Scoping Review.
Smith, Brandon G; Tumpa, Stasa; Mantle, Orla; Whiffin, Charlotte J; Mee, Harry; Solla, Davi J Fontoura; Paiva, Wellingson S; Newcombe, Virginia F J; Kolias, Angelos G; Hutchinson, Peter J.
Afiliação
  • Smith BG; Division of Neurosurgery, Department of Clinical Neurosciences, Addenbrooke's Hospital and University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
  • Tumpa S; NIHR Global Health Research Group on Neurotrauma, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
  • Mantle O; School of Clinical Medicine, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
  • Whiffin CJ; GKT School of Medical Education, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.
  • Mee H; NIHR Global Health Research Group on Neurotrauma, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
  • Solla DJF; College of Health, Psychology and Social Care, University of Derby, Derby, United Kingdom.
  • Paiva WS; Division of Neurosurgery, Department of Clinical Neurosciences, Addenbrooke's Hospital and University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
  • Newcombe VFJ; Division of Rehabilitation Medicine, Addenbrooke's Hospital and University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
  • Kolias AG; NIHR Global Health Research Group on Neurotrauma, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
  • Hutchinson PJ; Division of Neurosurgery, Department of Neurology, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
J Neurotrauma ; 39(19-20): 1289-1317, 2022 Oct.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35730115
ABSTRACT
Traumatic brain injury (TBI) remains a leading cause of death and disability worldwide. Motivations for outcome data collection in TBI are threefold to improve patient outcomes, to facilitate research, and to provide the means and methods for wider injury surveillance. Such data play a pivotal role in population health, and ways to increase the reliability of data collection following TBI should be pursued. As a result, technology-aided follow-up of patients with neurotrauma is on the rise; there is, therefore, a need to describe how such technologies have been used. A scoping review was conducted and reported using the PRISMA extension (PRISMA-ScR). Five electronic databases (Embase, MEDLINE, Global Health, PsycInfo, and Scopus) were searched systematically using keywords derived from the concepts of "telemedicine," "TBI," "outcome assessment," and "patient-generated health data." Forty studies described follow-up technologies (FUTs) utilizing telephones (52.5%, n = 21), short message service (SMS; 10%, n = 4), smartphones (22.5%, n = 9), videoconferencing (10%, n = 4), digital assistants (2.5%, n = 1), and custom devices (2.5%, n = 1) among cohorts of patients with TBI of varying injury severity. Where reported, clinical facilitators, remote follow-up timing and intervals between sessions, synchronicity of follow-up instances, proxy involvement, outcome measures utilized, and technology evaluation efforts are described. FUTs can aid more temporally sensitive assessments and capture fluctuating sequelae, a benefit of particular relevance to TBI cohorts. However, the evidence base surrounding FUTs remains in its infancy, particularly with respect to large samples, low- and middle-income patient cohorts, and the validation of outcome measures for deployment via such remote technology.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Systematic_reviews Limite: Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Systematic_reviews Limite: Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article