Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Few Differences in Sexual Talk by Gender/Sex and Dyad Type: A Retrospective and Daily Diary Study with Couples.
Merwin, Kathleen E; Bergeron, Sophie; Jodouin, Jean-Francois; Mackinnon, Sean P; Rosen, Natalie O.
Afiliação
  • Merwin KE; Department of Psychology and Neuroscience, Dalhousie University, 1355 Oxford St., P.O. Box 15000, Halifax, NS, B3H4R2, Canada.
  • Bergeron S; Department of Psychology, Université de Montréal, Montréal, QC, Canada.
  • Jodouin JF; Department of Psychology, Université de Montréal, Montréal, QC, Canada.
  • Mackinnon SP; Department of Psychology and Neuroscience, Dalhousie University, 1355 Oxford St., P.O. Box 15000, Halifax, NS, B3H4R2, Canada.
  • Rosen NO; Department of Psychology and Neuroscience, Dalhousie University, 1355 Oxford St., P.O. Box 15000, Halifax, NS, B3H4R2, Canada. natalie.rosen@dal.ca.
Arch Sex Behav ; 51(8): 3715-3733, 2022 11.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35882742
Sexual talk is a type of verbal communication that occurs exclusively during sexual activity and that is specific to the sexual activity itself. Previous research has identified two types of sexual talk: individualistic (i.e., self-focused) and mutualistic (i.e., sharing/partner-focused), which have generally been linked to greater sexual and relationship well-being. Whether sexual talk use varies by gender/sex (i.e., men, women, gender/sex diverse individuals; GSD) or dyad type (i.e., same- vs. mixed-gender/sex) has not been examined. Given initial evidence that the types of sexual talk may contribute differently to sexual and relationship well-being, it is important to identify factors (e.g., gender/sex) that may be associated with the amount of sexual talk used. We examined differences by gender/sex and dyad type in the average sexual talk use among long-term couples (N = 229; 69 same-gender/sex) using retrospective cross-sectional dyadic data. We also examined these differences in the same sample (N = 217) using a 35-day dyadic daily diary study. Retrospectively, but not daily, women reported using more mutualistic talk than men, especially when partnered with a woman. There were no significant gender/sex or dyad type differences in use of individualistic talk retrospectively or daily. Exploratory analyses with the GSD couples suggested that there may be gender/sex and dyad type differences retrospectively and daily, for individualistic and not mutualistic talk; however, these analyses must be interpreted with caution due to the small subsample size of GSD couples.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Observational_studies / Prevalence_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Female / Humans / Male Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Observational_studies / Prevalence_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Female / Humans / Male Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article