Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Randomised controlled trial of the Healthy Living Triple P-Positive Parenting Program for families of children with type 1 diabetes.
Mitchell, Amy E; Morawska, Alina; Lohan, Aditi; Filus, Ania; Batch, Jennifer.
Afiliação
  • Mitchell AE; School of Nursing and Midwifery, 5723Griffith University, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.
  • Morawska A; Menzies Health Institute Queensland, Griffith University, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.
  • Lohan A; Parenting and Family Support Centre, School of Psychology, 1974The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.
  • Filus A; Parenting and Family Support Centre, School of Psychology, 1974The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.
  • Batch J; Institute for Social Science Research, 1974The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.
J Child Health Care ; : 13674935221116694, 2022 Aug 11.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35950339
ABSTRACT
This randomised controlled trial examined the efficacy of a brief, group-based parenting program in improving child and family outcomes for families of children with type 1 diabetes. Families (N = 50) of children (2-10 years) with type 1 diabetes were randomly allocated to intervention (n = 22) or care-as-usual (n = 28). Assessments (pre-intervention, post-intervention and 6-month follow-up) evaluated parent- and child-reported parenting behaviour, child behaviour/adjustment and child quality of life (primary outcomes); and metabolic control (routinely-collected blood glucose data), parents' self-efficacy with diabetes management, diabetes-specific child behaviour difficulties, family quality of life, parents' diabetes-related and general parenting stress and observed parent and child behaviour (secondary outcomes). Intent-to-treat analyses indicated greater rate of improvement over time for families allocated to intervention compared to care-as-usual for use of corporal punishment (primary caregivers only), and confidence with managing children's emotions/behaviours, parent-rated child quality of life and adjustment to the child's illness (secondary caregivers only). There were no other intervention effects. Although families found the intervention useful, low levels of psychosocial problems at baseline limited the scope for group-level improvement and there was limited evidence for intervention efficacy. Individually-tailored measures of goal-specific behaviour change may be considered in future research.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article