Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Promoting First Relationships® for Primary Caregivers and Toddlers in a Native Community: a Randomized Controlled Trial.
Booth-LaForce, Cathryn; Oxford, Monica L; O'Leary, Rae; Buchwald, Dedra S.
Afiliação
  • Booth-LaForce C; Department of Child, Family, and Population Health Nursing, Barnard Center for Infant Mental Health and Development, University of Washington, Box 357231, Seattle, WA, 98195-7231, USA. cblaforce@gmail.com.
  • Oxford ML; Department of Child, Family, and Population Health Nursing, Barnard Center for Infant Mental Health and Development, University of Washington, Box 357231, Seattle, WA, 98195-7231, USA.
  • O'Leary R; Missouri Breaks Industries Research Inc, Eagle Butte, SD, 57625, USA.
  • Buchwald DS; Institute for Research and Education to Advance Community Health, Elson S. Floyd College of Medicine, Washington State University, 1100 Olive Way, Suite 1200, Seattle, WA, 98101, USA.
Prev Sci ; 24(1): 39-49, 2023 01.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35997845
This study tested the effectiveness of Promoting First Relationships® (PFR), a preventive intervention program aimed at fostering positive caregiver-child relationships in Native families living on a rural reservation. Participants were 162 primary caregivers (96% Native; 93% female) and their Native toddlers (10-31 months old; 50% female). Families were randomized to a PFR group (n = 81) or Resource and Referral (RR) control group (n = 81), after baseline data collection (Time 1) to assess the quality of caregiver-child interaction, caregiver knowledge about children's social-emotional needs, caregiver depressive symptoms, and child externalizing behavior. After delivery of the PFR intervention or the RR service, follow-up assessments were repeated immediately post-intervention (Time 2) and 3 months later (Time 3). After controlling for baseline assessments, multivariate analyses of covariance revealed that caregivers in the PFR group had significantly higher scores on knowledge about children's social-emotional needs at Time 2 (p < .01, η2 = .06) and Time 3 (p < .05, η2 = .04) and less severe depressive symptoms at Times 2 and 3 (both p < .05, η2 = .04). At Time 3, the quality of caregiver-child interaction was better in the PFR group (p < .01, η2 = .06), an effect that was moderated by severity of depressive symptoms (p = .05, η2 = .06), with PFR having the greatest impact at low levels of initial symptoms (p = .02). Results support the positive impact of PFR in a Native community and suggest conditions under which the intervention may be most effective.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials Limite: Child, preschool / Female / Humans / Infant / Male Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials Limite: Child, preschool / Female / Humans / Infant / Male Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article