Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Effectiveness of Perampanel as the Only Add-on: Retrospective, Multicenter, Observational Real Life Study on epilepsy patients.
Gasparini, Sara; Ferlazzo, Edoardo; Neri, Sabrina; Cianci, Vittoria; Iudice, Alfonso; Bisulli, Francesca; Bonanni, Paolo; Caggia, Emanuele; D'Aniello, Alfredo; Di Bonaventura, Carlo; DiFrancesco, Jacopo C; Domina, Elisabetta; Dono, Fedele; Gambardella, Antonio; Marini, Carla; Marrelli, Alfonso; Matricardi, Sara; Morano, Alessandra; Paladin, Francesco; Renna, Rosaria; Striano, Pasquale; Pascarella, Angelo; Ascoli, Michele; Aguglia, Umberto.
Afiliação
  • Gasparini S; Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, Magna Graecia University of Catanzaro, Italy.
  • Ferlazzo E; Regional Epilepsy Centre, Great Metropolitan "Bianchi-Melacrino-Morelli Hospital", Reggio Calabria, Italy.
  • Neri S; Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, Magna Graecia University of Catanzaro, Italy.
  • Cianci V; Regional Epilepsy Centre, Great Metropolitan "Bianchi-Melacrino-Morelli Hospital", Reggio Calabria, Italy.
  • Iudice A; Institute of Molecular Bioimaging and Physiology, National Research Council, Catanzaro, Italy.
  • Bisulli F; Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, Magna Graecia University of Catanzaro, Italy.
  • Bonanni P; Regional Epilepsy Centre, Great Metropolitan "Bianchi-Melacrino-Morelli Hospital", Reggio Calabria, Italy.
  • Caggia E; Regional Epilepsy Centre, Great Metropolitan "Bianchi-Melacrino-Morelli Hospital", Reggio Calabria, Italy.
  • D'Aniello A; Department of Neurosciences, Section of Neurology, University of Pisa, Italy.
  • Di Bonaventura C; Department of Biomedical and NeuroMotor Sciences, Alma Mater Studiorum-University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
  • DiFrancesco JC; Epilepsy and Clinical neurophysiology Unit, Scientific Institute, IRCCS Eugenio Medea, Conegliano, Treviso, Italy.
  • Domina E; Neurology Unit, Oospedale Giovanni Paolo II, Ragusa, Italy.
  • Dono F; IRCCS Neuromed, Pozzilli, IS, Italy.
  • Gambardella A; Epilepsy Unit, Department of Human Neurosciences, "Sapienza" University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
  • Marini C; Department of Neurology, ASST S. Gerardo Hospital, University of Milano-Bicocca, Monza, Italy.
  • Marrelli A; U.C. Neurology, Ospedale Maggiore di Lodi ASST, Lodi, Italy.
  • Matricardi S; Department of Neuroscience, Imaging and Clinical Science, "G. D'Annunzio" University of Chieti-Pescara, Chieti, Italy.
  • Morano A; Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, Magna Graecia University of Catanzaro, Italy.
  • Paladin F; Institute of Molecular Bioimaging and Physiology, National Research Council, Catanzaro, Italy.
  • Renna R; Neurologic Clinic, Magna Graecia University of Catanzaro, Italy.
  • Striano P; Child Neurology and Psychiatric Unit, G. Salesi Pediatric Hospital; United Hospitals of Ancona; Ancona.
  • Pascarella A; Neurophysiopathology Unit, Epilepsy Center, San Salvatore Hospital, L'Aquila, Italy.
  • Ascoli M; Child Neurology and Psychiatric Unit, G. Salesi Pediatric Hospital; United Hospitals of Ancona; Ancona.
  • Aguglia U; IRCCS Neuromed, Pozzilli, IS, Italy.
Epilepsia Open ; 2022 09 08.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36082380
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE:

Perampanel (PER) is indicated as adjunctive antiseizure medication (ASM) in adolescents and adults with epilepsy. Data from clinical trials show good efficacy and tolerability, while limited information is available on the routine clinical use of PER, especially when used as only add-on treatment.

METHODS:

we performed an observational, retrospective, multicenter study on people with focal or generalized epilepsy aged >12 years, consecutively recruited from 52 Italian epilepsy centers. All patients received PER as the only add-on treatment to a background ASM according to standard clinical practice. Retention rate, seizure frequency and adverse events were recorded at 3, 6 and 12 months after PER introduction. Sub-analyses by early or late use of PER and by concomitant ASM were also conducted.

RESULTS:

503 patients were included (age 36.5±19.9 years). Eighty-one per cent had focal epilepsy. Overall, the retention rate was very high in the whole group (89% at 12 months) according with efficacy measures. No major differences were observed in the sub-analyses, although patients who used PER as early add-on, as compared with late add-on, more often reached early seizure freedom at 3 months follow-up (66% vs. 53%, p=0.05). Treatment-emergent adverse events occurred in 25%, far less commonly than in PER randomized trials.

SIGNIFICANCE:

this study confirms the good efficacy and safety of PER for focal or generalized epilepsy in real-life conditions. We provide robust data about its effectiveness as only add-on treatment even in patients with a long-standing history of epilepsy and previously treated with many ASMs.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article