Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Optimal sampling and analysis methods for clinical diagnostics of vaginal microbiome.
Kero, Katja; Hieta, Niina; Kallonen, Teemu; Ahtikoski, Anne; Laine, Hanna K; Rautava, Jaana; Munukka, Eveliina.
Afiliação
  • Kero K; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Turku University Hospital, University of Turku, Turku, Finland.
  • Hieta N; Department of Dermatology, Turku University Hospital, University of Turku, Turku, Finland.
  • Kallonen T; Research Center for Cancer, Infections and Immunity, Institute of Biomedicine, University of Turku, Turku, Finland.
  • Ahtikoski A; Department of Clinical Microbiology, Turku University Hospital, Turku, Finland.
  • Laine HK; Institute of Biomedicine, Microbiome Biobank, University of Turku, Turku, Finland.
  • Rautava J; Department of Pathology, Turku University Hospital, University of Turku, Turku, Finland.
  • Munukka E; Department of Oral Pathology and Oral Radiology, Institute of Dentistry, Faculty of Medicine, University of Turku, Turku, Finland. hanna.k.laine@helsinki.fi.
Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis ; 42(2): 201-208, 2023 Feb.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36624297
Next-generation sequencing-based microbiological analysis is a complex way to profile vaginal microbiome samples since each step affects the results gained. Methodologies for sample collection lack golden standards. We compared Puritan DNA/RNA swab (PS) and Copan FLOQ swab (CS) and provided consistent and reliable microbiome profiles analyzed by 16S rRNA gene sequencing. We collected two consecutive vaginal samples utilizing PS with room temperature storing and CS with instant freezing from 26 women. Variable region 4 of bacterial 16S rRNA gene was amplified with single PCR by custom-designed dual-indexed primers and sequenced with Illumina MiSeq system. Read quality control, operational taxonomic unit tables, and alpha and beta diversities analysis were performed, and community richness, diversity, and evenness were evaluated and compared between the two samplings and tests. Nineteen sample pairs produced detectable, intact DNA during the extraction protocol and/or further microbial profiles. Alpha bacterial diversity indices were independent on the collection protocol. No significant statistical differences were found in the measured beta diversity metrics between the collection methods. Of the women, 43% had Lactobacillus-dominated vaginal microbiome profile despite of collection method. Previously reported important vaginal microbiome phyla Actinobacteria, Bacteroidetes, Firmicutes, Fusobacteria, and Proteobacteria were present in the sample set although their relative abundances varied among individuals. PS and CS enable constant vaginal microbiota sampling. The PS method with no need for instant freezing is suitable for on-site collections at clinics. Furthermore, it seems to be possible to take two samples instead of one with constant microbiological results.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Guideline Limite: Female / Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Guideline Limite: Female / Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article