Retrospective motion correction through multi-average k-space data elimination (REMAKE) for free-breathing cardiac cine imaging.
Magn Reson Med
; 89(6): 2242-2254, 2023 06.
Article
em En
| MEDLINE
| ID: mdl-36763898
ABSTRACT
PURPOSE:
To develop a motion-robust reconstruction technique for free-breathing cine imaging with multiple averages.METHOD:
Retrospective motion correction through multiple average k-space data elimination (REMAKE) was developed using iterative removal of k-space segments (from individual k-space samples) that contribute most to motion corruption while combining any remaining segments across multiple signal averages. A variant of REMAKE, termed REMAKE+, was developed to address any losses in SNR due to k-space information removal. With REMAKE+, multiple reconstructions using different initial conditions were performed, co-registered, and averaged. Both techniques were validated against clinical "standard" signal averaging reconstruction in a static phantom (with simulated motion) and 15 patients undergoing free-breathing cine imaging with multiple averages. Quantitative analysis of myocardial sharpness, blood/myocardial SNR, myocardial-blood contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR), as well as subjective assessment of image quality and rate of diagnostic quality images were performed.RESULTS:
In phantom, motion artifacts using "standard" (RMS error [RMSE] 2.2 ± 0.5) were substantially reduced using REMAKE/REMAKE+ (RMSE 1.5 ± 0.4/1.0 ± 0.4, p < 0.01). In patients, REMAKE/REMAKE+ led to higher myocardial sharpness (0.79 ± 0.09/0.79 ± 0.1 vs. 0.74 ± 0.12 for "standard", p = 0.004/0.04), higher image quality (1.8 ± 0.2/1.9 ± 0.2 vs. 1.6 ± 0.4 for "standard", p = 0.02/0.008), and a higher rate of diagnostic quality images (99%/100% vs. 94% for "standard"). Blood/myocardial SNR for "standard" (94 ± 30/33 ± 10) was higher vs. REMAKE (80 ± 25/28 ± 8, p = 0.002/0.005) and tended to be lower vs. REMAKE+ (105 ± 33/36 ± 12, p = 0.02/0.06). Myocardial-blood CNR for "standard" (61 ± 22) was higher vs. REMAKE (53 ± 19, p = 0.003) and lower vs. REMAKE+ (69 ± 24, p = 0.007).CONCLUSIONS:
Compared to "standard" signal averaging reconstruction, REMAKE and REMAKE+ provide improved myocardial sharpness, image quality, and rate of diagnostic quality images.Palavras-chave
Texto completo:
1
Coleções:
01-internacional
Base de dados:
MEDLINE
Tipo de estudo:
Observational_studies
Limite:
Humans
Idioma:
En
Ano de publicação:
2023
Tipo de documento:
Article