Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Fracture risk in women with osteoporosis initiated on gastro-resistant risedronate versus immediate release risedronate or alendronate: a claims data analysis in the USA.
Eisman, John A; Cortet, Bernard; Boolell, Mitra; Ionescu-Ittu, Raluca; Vekeman, Francis; Heroux, Julie; Thomasius, Friederike.
Afiliação
  • Eisman JA; Bone Biology Division, Garvan Institute of Medical Research, Darlinghurst, Australia.
  • Cortet B; School of Medicine Sydney, University of Notre Dame Australia, Sydney, Australia.
  • Boolell M; St Vincent's Hospital, UNSW Sydney, NSW, Sydney, Australia.
  • Ionescu-Ittu R; Service de Rhumatologie, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Lille, Lille, France.
  • Vekeman F; Theramex, Sloane Square House 1 Holbein Place Belgravia, London, SW1W 8NS, UK. Mitra.Boolell@theramex.com.
  • Heroux J; STATLOG, Montreal, Canada.
  • Thomasius F; STATLOG, Montreal, Canada.
Osteoporos Int ; 34(5): 977-991, 2023 May.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36872338
The study results indicate that women with osteoporosis initiated on gastro-resistant risedronate have a lower risk of fracture than those initiated on immediate release risedronate or alendronate. A large proportion of women discontinued all oral bisphosphonate therapies within 1 year of treatment start. PURPOSE: Using a US claims database (2009-2019), we compared risk of fractures between women with osteoporosis initiated on gastro-resistant (GR) risedronate and those initiated on (a) immediate release (IR) risedronate or (b) immediate release alendronate. METHODS: Women aged ≥ 60 years with osteoporosis who had ≥ 2 oral bisphosphonate prescription fills were followed for ≥ 1 year after the first observed bisphosphonates dispensing (index date). Fracture risk was compared between the GR risedronate and IR risedronate/alendronate cohorts using adjusted incidence rate ratios (aIRRs), both overall and in subgroups with high fracture risk due to older age or comorbidity/medications. Site-specific fractures were identified based on diagnosis codes recorded on medical claims using a claims-based algorithm. Persistence on bisphosphonate therapy was evaluated for all groups. RESULTS: aIRRs generally indicated lower fracture risk for GR risedronate than IR risedronate and alendronate. When comparing GR risedronate to IR risedronate, statistically significant aIRRs (p < 0.05) were observed for pelvic fractures in the full cohorts (aIRRs = 0.37), for any fracture and pelvic fractures among women aged ≥ 65 years (aIRRs = 0.63 and 0.41), for any fracture and pelvic fractures among women aged ≥ 70 years (aIRRs = 0.69 and 0.24), and for pelvic fracture among high-risk women due to comorbidity/medications (aIRR = 0.34). When comparing GR risedronate to alendronate, statistically significant aIRRs were observed for pelvic fractures in the full cohorts (aIRR = 0.54), for any fracture and wrist/arm fractures among women aged ≥ 65 years (aIRRs = 0.73 and 0.63), and for any fracture, pelvic, and wrist/arm fractures among women aged ≥ 70 years (aIRRs = 0.72, 0.36, and 0.58). In all cohorts, ~ 40% completely discontinued oral bisphosphonates within 1 year. CONCLUSIONS: Discontinuation rates of oral bisphosphonate therapy were high. However, women initiated on GR risedronate had a significantly lower risk of fracture for several skeletal sites than women initiated on IR risedronate/alendronate, particularly those aged ≥ 70 years.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Etiology_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Female / Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Etiology_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Female / Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article