Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Identifying opportunities for upstream evaluations relevant to child and maternal health: a UK policy-mapping review.
Stewart, Emma; Pearce, Anna; Given, Joanne; Gilbert, Ruth; Brophy, Sinead; Cookson, Richard; Hardelid, Pia; Harron, Katie L; Leyland, Alastair; Wood, Rachael; Dundas, Ruth.
Afiliação
  • Stewart E; MRC/CSO Social and Public Health Sciences Unit, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK Emma.Stewart@glasgow.ac.uk.
  • Pearce A; MRC/CSO Social and Public Health Sciences Unit, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.
  • Given J; School of Nursing and Paramedic Science, Ulster University, Coleraine, Londonderry, UK.
  • Gilbert R; Population, Policy and Practice Department, UCL Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, London, UK.
  • Brophy S; School of Medicine, Swansea University, Swansea, UK.
  • Cookson R; Centre for Health Economics, University of York, York, North Yorkshire, UK.
  • Hardelid P; Population, Policy and Practice Department, UCL Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, London, UK.
  • Harron KL; Population, Policy and Practice Department, UCL Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, London, UK.
  • Leyland A; MRC/CSO Social and Public Health Sciences Unit, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.
  • Wood R; Public Health Scotland, Edinburgh, UK.
  • Dundas R; Usher Institute, The University of Edinburgh Usher Institute of Population Health Sciences and Informatics, Edinburgh, UK.
Arch Dis Child ; 108(7): 556-562, 2023 07.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37001969
OBJECTIVE: Interventions to tackle the social determinants of health can improve outcomes during pregnancy and early childhood, leading to better health across the life course. Variation in content, timing and implementation of policies across the 4 UK nations allows for evaluation. We conducted a policy-mapping review (1981-2021) to identify relevant UK early years policies across the social determinants of health framework, and determine suitable candidates for evaluation using administrative data. METHODS: We used open keyword and category searches of UK and devolved Government websites, and hand searched policy reviews. Policies were rated and included using five criteria: (1) Potential for policy to affect maternal and child health outcomes; (2) Implementation variation across the UK; (3) Population reach and expected effect size; (4) Ability to identify exposed/eligible group in administrative data; (5) Potential to affect health inequalities. An expert consensus workshop determined a final shortlist. RESULTS: 336 policies and 306 strategy documents were identified. Policies were mainly excluded due to criteria 2-4, leaving 88. The consensus workshop identified three policy areas as suitable candidates for natural experiment evaluation using administrative data: pregnancy grants, early years education and childcare, and Universal Credit. CONCLUSION: Our comprehensive policy review identifies valuable opportunities to evaluate sociostructural impacts on mother and child outcomes. However, many potentially impactful policies were excluded. This may lead to the inverse evidence law, where there is least evidence for policies believed to be most effective. This could be ameliorated by better access to administrative data, staged implementation of future policies or alternative evaluation methods.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Prognostic_studies Limite: Child, preschool / Female / Humans / Pregnancy País/Região como assunto: Europa Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Prognostic_studies Limite: Child, preschool / Female / Humans / Pregnancy País/Região como assunto: Europa Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article