Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Efficacy and safety of azathioprine plus prednisone versus prednisone alone as first-line treatment for antinuclear antibody-positive immune thrombocytopenia: a retrospective cohort study.
Su, Junnan; Xu, Meihong; Dong, Zhigao; Wang, Qingqing; Ma, Lili; Xiao, Pingping; Chen, Xuyan.
Afiliação
  • Su J; Department of Blood Rheumatism Immunology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Xiamen Medical College, Xiamen, People's Republic of China.
  • Xu M; Department of Physical Examination, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Xiamen Medical College, Xiamen, People's Republic of China.
  • Dong Z; Department of Blood Rheumatism Immunology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Xiamen Medical College, Xiamen, People's Republic of China.
  • Wang Q; Department of Blood Rheumatism Immunology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Xiamen Medical College, Xiamen, People's Republic of China.
  • Ma L; Department of Blood Rheumatism Immunology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Xiamen Medical College, Xiamen, People's Republic of China.
  • Xiao P; Department of Blood Rheumatism Immunology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Xiamen Medical College, Xiamen, People's Republic of China.
  • Chen X; Department of Blood Rheumatism Immunology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Xiamen Medical College, Xiamen, People's Republic of China.
Hematology ; 28(1): 2196864, 2023 Dec.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37014744
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE:

Antinuclear antibody (ANA)-positive immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) patients have an unsatisfactory prognosis due to the more severe conditions of these patients and poor response to first-line glucocorticoids (GCs). The current study intended to compare the efficacy and safety of AZA plus prednisone and prednisone alone as first-line treatment in ANA-positive ITP patients.

METHODS:

Fifteen ANA-positive ITP patients receiving AZA plus prednisone (AZA + GC group) and eighteen ANA-positive ITP patients receiving prednisone alone (GC group) as first-line treatment were retrospectively enrolled.

RESULTS:

The complete response (CR) rate (60.0% versus 22.2%) (P = 0.038) was increased in the AZA + GC group versus the GC group, while the overall response rate (86.7% versus 55.6%) (P = 0.070) only showed an increasing trend that did not achieve statistical significance. In addition, multivariate analysis revealed that AZA + GC (versus GC) (odds ratio = 31.331, P = 0.018) was independently associated with a higher possibility of achieving CR. Additionally, accumulating relapse-free duration was prolonged in the AZA + GC group versus the GC group (median 7.8 months versus 3.4 months) (P = 0.038). Additionally, the multivariate analysis suggested that AZA + GC (versus GC) (hazard ratio = 0.306, P = 0.007) was independently correlated with longer accumulating relapse-free duration. The incidence of adverse events did not differ between the two groups (all P > 0.05), and the common adverse events in the AZA + GC group were pneumonia (13.3%), anemia (13.3%), cough (13.3%), nausea (6.7%), and granulocytopenia (6.7%), which were all tolerable and manageable.

CONCLUSION:

First-line AZA plus prednisone realizes a better hematological response and relapse-free duration with acceptable adverse events compared to prednisone alone in ANA-positive ITP patients.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Etiology_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Etiology_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article