Differences in angular kinematics when using thigh, implant, or medial knee markers in osseointegrated transfemoral prosthetic gait.

Ravari, Reihaneh; Lewicke, Justin; Vette, Albert H; Hebert, Jacqueline S

Ravari, Reihaneh; Lewicke, Justin; Vette, Albert H; Hebert, Jacqueline S.

Afiliação

Ravari R; Faculty of Rehabilitation Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada.
Lewicke J; Glenrose Rehabilitation Hospital, Alberta Health Services, Edmonton, AB, Canada.
Vette AH; Glenrose Rehabilitation Hospital, Alberta Health Services, Edmonton, AB, Canada; Department of Mechanical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada.
Hebert JS; Glenrose Rehabilitation Hospital, Alberta Health Services, Edmonton, AB, Canada; Division of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine & Dentistry, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada. Electronic address: jhebert@ualberta.ca.

Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon) ; 105: 105976, 2023 05.

Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37127007

Assuntos

Prótese Articular; Coxa da Perna; Adulto; Humanos; Feminino; Fenômenos Biomecânicos; Osseointegração; Articulação do Joelho/cirurgia; Marcha; Amplitude de Movimento Articular

Palavras-chave

Gait analysis; Implant marker; Medial knee marker; Soft-tissue artifacts; Thigh marker; Transfemoral prosthesis

Texto completo

Imprimir

XML

PubMed Links

Buscar no Google

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Prognostic_studies Limite: Adult / Female / Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo

Imprimir

XML

PubMed Links

Buscar no Google