Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Radioembolization with Yttrium-90 Glass Microspheres as a First-Line Treatment for Unresectable Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma-A Prospective Feasibility Study.
Kis, Bela; Shridhar, Ravi; Mhaskar, Rahul; Gyano, Marcell; Frakes, Jessica M; El-Haddad, Ghassan; Choi, Junsung; Kim, Richard D; Hoffe, Sarah E.
Afiliação
  • Kis B; Department of Diagnostic Imaging and Interventional Radiology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, Florida. Electronic address: bela.kis@moffitt.org.
  • Shridhar R; Radiation Oncology, AdventHealth Cancer Institute, Orlando, Florida.
  • Mhaskar R; Department of Internal Medicine, University of South Florida Morsani College of Medicine, Tampa, Florida.
  • Gyano M; Department of Diagnostic Imaging and Interventional Radiology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, Florida.
  • Frakes JM; Department of Radiation Oncology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, Florida.
  • El-Haddad G; Department of Diagnostic Imaging and Interventional Radiology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, Florida.
  • Choi J; Department of Diagnostic Imaging and Interventional Radiology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, Florida.
  • Kim RD; Department of Gastrointestinal Oncology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, Florida.
  • Hoffe SE; Department of Radiation Oncology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, Florida.
J Vasc Interv Radiol ; 34(9): 1547-1555, 2023 09.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37210030
ABSTRACT

PURPOSE:

To evaluate the safety and effectiveness of yttrium-90 (90Y) radioembolization as first-line treatment for unresectable intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC). MATERIALS AND

METHODS:

This prospective study enrolled patients who had never received chemotherapy, liver embolization, and radiation therapy. The tumors were solitary in 16 patients, multiple in 8 patients, unilobar in 14 patients, and bilobar in 10 patients. Patients underwent transarterial radioembolization with 90Y-labeled glass microspheres. The primary end point was hepatic progression-free survival (HPFS). Secondary end points were overall survival (OS), tumor response, and toxicity.

RESULTS:

Twenty-four patients (age, 72.3 years ± 9.3; 12 women) were included in the study. The median delivered radiation dose was 135.5 Gy (interquartile range, 77.6 Gy). The median HPFS was 5.5 months (95% CI, 3.9-7.0 months). Analysis failed to identify any prognostic factor associated with HPFS. Imaging response at 3 months showed 56% disease control, and the best radiographic response was 71% disease control. The median OS from the radioembolization treatment was 19.4 months (95% CI, 5.0-33.7). Patients with solitary ICC had significantly longer median OS than patients with multifocal ICC 25.9 months (95% CI, 20.8-31.0 months) versus 10.7 months (95% CI, 8.0-13.4 months) (P = .02). Patients with progression on the 3-month imaging follow-up had significantly shorter median OS than patients who had stable disease at 3 months 10.7 months (95% CI, 0.7-20.7 months) versus 37.3 months (95% CI, 16.5-58.1 months) (P = .003). Two (8%) Grade 3 toxicities were reported.

CONCLUSIONS:

First-line treatment of ICC with radioembolization showed promising OS and minimal toxicity, especially in patients with solitary tumor. Radioembolization may be considered as a first-line treatment option for unresectable ICC.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Aged / Female / Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Aged / Female / Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article