Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Seminal papers in urology: anticholinergic therapy vs. onabotulinumtoxina for urgency urinary incontinence.
Shugg, Nathan; O'Callaghan, Michael E.
Afiliação
  • Shugg N; Urology Unit, Flinders Medical Centre, Bedford Park, Australia.
  • O'Callaghan ME; Urology Unit, Flinders Medical Centre, Bedford Park, Australia. Michael.ocallaghan@health.sa.gov.au.
BMC Urol ; 23(1): 98, 2023 May 24.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37226116
In this critical review, we explore the study design, strengths, and limitations of landmark trial "Anticholinergic therapy vs. onabotulinumtoxinA for urgency urinary incontinence". This trial was the first to directly compare two key treatment options for urge urinary incontinence - anticholinergic medication and intravesical botox, and still influences clinical guidelines a decade after publication. This non-inferiority, double-blinded, multi-centre randomised controlled trial administered Solifenacin or intra-detrusor botox to women, measuring outcomes six months post-treatment. Non-inferiority of the treatments was established, though Botox had a higher rate of retention and infection, with side effect profile rising as the key discriminator in selecting first-line therapy.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Guideline Limite: Female / Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Guideline Limite: Female / Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article