Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
The Integration of Value Assessment and Social Network Methods for Breast Health Navigation Among African Americans.
Molina, Yamilé; Kao, Szu-Yu; Bergeron, Nyahne Q; Strayhorn-Carter, Shaila M; Strahan, Desmona C; Asche, Carl; Watson, Karriem S; Khanna, Aditya S; Hempstead, Bridgette; Fitzpatrick, Veronica; Calhoun, Elizabeth A; McDougall, Jean.
Afiliação
  • Molina Y; University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA. Electronic address: ymolin2@uic.edu.
  • Kao SY; University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
  • Bergeron NQ; University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.
  • Strayhorn-Carter SM; University of North Carolina Wilmington, Wilmington, NC, USA.
  • Strahan DC; University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.
  • Asche C; University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA; Huntsman Cancer Institute, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.
  • Watson KS; National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA.
  • Khanna AS; Brown University, Providence, RI, USA.
  • Hempstead B; Cierra Sisters, Seattle, WA, USA.
  • Fitzpatrick V; Advocate Aurora Health, Downers Grove, IL, USA.
  • Calhoun EA; University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.
  • McDougall J; Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA, USA.
Value Health ; 26(10): 1494-1502, 2023 10.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37301367
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES:

A major strategy to reduce the impact of breast cancer (BC) among African Americans (AA) is patient navigation, defined here as individualized assistance for reducing barriers to healthcare use. The primary focus of this study was to estimate the added value of incorporating breast health promotion by navigated participants and the subsequent BC screenings that network members may obtain.

METHODS:

In this study, we compared the cost-effectiveness of navigation across 2 scenarios. First, we examine the effect of navigation on AA participants (scenario 1). Second, we examine the effect of navigation on AA participants and their networks (scenario 2). We leverage data from multiple studies in South Chicago. Our primary outcome (BC screening) is intermediate, given limited available quantitative data on the long-term benefits of BC screening for AA populations.

RESULTS:

When considering participant effects alone (scenario 1), the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio was $3845 per additional screening mammogram. When including participant and network effects (scenario 2), the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio was $1098 per additional screening mammogram.

CONCLUSION:

Our findings suggest that inclusion of network effects can contribute to a more precise, comprehensive assessment of interventions for underserved communities.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Screening_studies Limite: Female / Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Screening_studies Limite: Female / Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article