Differences between DNA vaccine and single-cycle viral vaccine in the ability of cross-protection against viral hemorrhagic septicemia virus (VHSV) and infectious hematopoietic necrosis virus (IHNV).

ABSTRACT

Vaccination procedures can be stressful for fish and can bring severe side effects. Therefore, vaccines that can minimize the number of administrations and maximize cross-protection against multiple serotypes, genotypes, or even different species would be highly advantageous. In the present study, we investigated the cross-protective ability of two types of vaccines - viral hemorrhagic septicemia virus (VHSV) G protein-expressing DNA vaccine and G gene-deleted single-cycle VHSV genotype IVa (rVHSV-ΔG) vaccine - against both VHSV genotype Ia and infectious hematopoietic necrosis virus (IHNV) in rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss). The results showed that rainbow trout immunized with VHSV genotype Ia G gene- or IVa G gene-expressing DNA vaccine were significantly protected against VHSV genotype Ia, but were not protected against IHNV. In contrast to the DNA vaccine, the single-cycle VHSV IVa vaccine induced significant protection against not only VHSV Ia but also IHNV. Considering no significant increase in ELISA titer and serum neutralization activity against IHNV in fish immunized with single-cycle VHSV IVa, the protection might be independent of humoral adaptive immunity. The scarcity of cytotoxic T cell epitopes between VHSV and IHNV suggested that the possibility of involvement of cytotoxic T cell-mediated cellular adaptive immunity would be low. The role of trained immunity (innate immune memory) in cross-protection should be further investigated.