Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
In Situ Patch Test and Repeated Open Application Test for Fixed Drug Eruption: A Multicenter Study.
Traineau, Hélène; Milpied, Brigitte; Soria, Angèle; Assier, Haudrey; Tetart, Florence; Bernier, Claire; Le Bouëdec, Marie-Christine Ferrier; Gener, Gwendeline; Kurihara, Flore; Bauvin, Olivia; Delauney, Juliette; Amsler, Emmanuelle; Bara, Corina; Pelletier, Fabien; Valois, Aude; Castelain, Florence; de Risi Pugliese, Tullia; Hamelin, Aurore; Barbaud, Annick.
Afiliação
  • Traineau H; Médecine Sorbonne Universiy, Dermatology and allergology department, Hôpital Tenon, Assistance Publique des Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP), Paris, France.
  • Milpied B; Centre hospitalo-universitaire (CHU) de Bordeaux, Dermatology department, Saint André hospital, Bordeaux, France.
  • Soria A; Cimi-Paris Inserm 1135, AP-HP, Sorbonne University, Hôpital Tenon, Dermatology and allergology department, Paris, France.
  • Assier H; Dermatology department, AP-HP, Henri Mondor hospital, Créteil, France.
  • Tetart F; Dermatology department, CHU de Rouen, Rouen, France.
  • Bernier C; Dermatology department, CHU de Nantes, Nantes, France.
  • Le Bouëdec MF; CHU de Clermont Ferrand, Dermatology department, Estaing hospital, Clermont-Ferrand, France.
  • Gener G; Dermatology department, AP-HP, Henri Mondor hospital, Créteil, France.
  • Kurihara F; Médecine Sorbonne Universiy, Dermatology and allergology department, Hôpital Tenon, Assistance Publique des Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP), Paris, France.
  • Bauvin O; Dermatology department, CHU de Rouen, Rouen, France.
  • Delauney J; CHU d'Angers, Dermatology department, Centre hospitalier de Cholet, Angers, France.
  • Amsler E; Médecine Sorbonne Universiy, Dermatology and allergology department, Hôpital Tenon, Assistance Publique des Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP), Paris, France.
  • Bara C; Dermatology department, Centre hospitalier du Mans, Le Mans, France.
  • Pelletier F; Dermatology department, CHU de Besançon, Besançon, France.
  • Valois A; Dermatology department, Hôpital d'instruction des armées Sainte Anne, Toulon, France.
  • Castelain F; Dermatology department, CHU de Besançon, Besançon, France.
  • de Risi Pugliese T; Médecine Sorbonne Universiy, Dermatology and allergology department, Hôpital Tenon, Assistance Publique des Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP), Paris, France.
  • Hamelin A; Médecine Sorbonne Universiy, Dermatology and allergology department, Hôpital Tenon, Assistance Publique des Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP), Paris, France.
  • Barbaud A; Médecine Sorbonne Universiy, Dermatology and allergology department, Hôpital Tenon, Assistance Publique des Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP), Paris, France. Electronic address: annick.barbaud@aphp.fr.
J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract ; 12(2): 460-468, 2024 02.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37863314
BACKGROUND: Few studies have evaluated allergy workup in fixed drug eruption (FDE) in a large population. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the sensitivity of a standardized allergy workup for diagnosing the cause of FDE, with a focus on in situ repeated open application tests (ROATs). METHODS: In a retrospective multicenter study, we analyzed the practice of conducting a complete allergy workup for the etiological diagnosis of FDE. It consisted of 3 steps: in situ patch tests (PTs) for all cases except pure mucosal involvement, followed by in situ ROAT if in situ PT results were negative, and finally a drug challenge (DC). The in situ ROAT involved daily application of the suspected drug on a previously affected FDE site for 7 days. RESULTS: Of 98 suspected FDE cases, 61 patients (median age 61 y; male-to-female ratio 1.8) with a complete allergy workup were included. In 4 cases, even the DC yielded negative results. Among the remaining 57 patients with a positive workup, implicated drugs included paracetamol (12 cases), ß-lactams (11 cases), imidazoles (9 cases, including 5 with metronidazole), nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (8 cases), iodinated contrast media (4 cases), cotrimoxazole (3 cases), and various other drugs in 10 patients. The diagnosis was confirmed by in situ PT in 17 of 54 cases (31.5%), in situ ROAT in 14 of 40 cases (35%) (with 4 cases showing remote reactivation of FDE sites), and DC in 26 cases. CONCLUSIONS: The sequential allergy workup involving successively in situ PT, in situ ROAT, and DC is a reliable and safe method for diagnosing the cause of FDE. In situ tests exhibited a sensitivity of over 50%.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Limite: Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Limite: Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article