Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
An international study to explore the feasibility of collecting standardised outcome data for Complex Regional Pain Syndrome: recommendations for an international clinical research registry.
Grieve, Sharon; Brunner, Florian; Cabral, Danylo F; Connett, Robyn; Hirata, Hitoshi; Iwasaki, Norimasa; Nakagawa, Yasunobu; Sagir, Afrin; Sousa, Gudson; Vatine, Jean-Jacques; Vaughan-Spickers, Nicole; Xu, Jijun; Buckle, Lisa; McCabe, Candida.
Afiliação
  • Grieve S; Royal United Hospitals Bath NHS Foundation Trust, Bath, UK.
  • Brunner F; University of the West of England, Bristol, UK.
  • Cabral DF; Balgrist University Hospital, Zurich, Switzerland.
  • Connett R; University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida, USA.
  • Hirata H; PPI partner, Exeter, UK.
  • Iwasaki N; Nagoya University, Nagoya, Japan.
  • Nakagawa Y; Hokkaido University, Hokkaido, Japan.
  • Sagir A; Nagoya University, Nagoya, Japan.
  • Sousa G; Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA.
  • Vatine JJ; University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, USA.
  • Vaughan-Spickers N; Move Rehabilitation Center, Maceió, Brazil.
  • Xu J; Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.
  • Buckle L; Reuth Rehabilitation Hospital, Tel Aviv, Israel.
  • McCabe C; University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.
Br J Pain ; 17(5): 468-478, 2023 Oct.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38107759
ABSTRACT

Introduction:

Complex Regional Pain Syndrome (CRPS) is a persistent pain condition with low prevalence. Multi-centre collaborative research is needed to attain sufficient sample sizes for meaningful studies. This international observational study (1) tested the feasibility and acceptability of collecting outcome data using an agreed core measurement set (2) tested and refined an electronic data management system to collect and manage the data.

Methods:

Adults with CRPS, meeting the Budapest diagnostic clinical criteria, were recruited to the study from 7 international research centres. After informed consent, a questionnaire comprising the core set outcome measures was completed on paper at baseline (T1), and at 3 or 6 months (T2) using a paper or e-version. Participants and clinicians provided feedback on the data collection process. Clinicians completed the CRPS severity score at T1 and optionally, at T2. Ethical approval was obtained at each international centre.

Results:

Ninety-eight adults were recruited (female n=66; mean age 46.6 years, range 19-89), of whom 32% chose to receive the T2 questionnaire in an electronic format. Fifty-five participants completed both T1 and T2. Eighteen participants and nine clinicians provided feedback on their data collection experience.

Conclusion:

This study confirmed the questionnaire core outcome data are feasible and practicable to collect in clinical practice. The electronic data management system provided a robust means of collecting and managing the data across an international population. The findings have informed the final data collection tools and processes which will comprise the first international, clinical research registry and data bank for CRPS.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article