Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Chemical prophylaxis and venous thromboembolism following elective spinal surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Rahmani, Roman; Eaddy, Samuel; Stegelmann, Samuel D; Skrobot, Gabriel; Andreshak, Thomas.
Afiliação
  • Rahmani R; Mercy Health St. Vincent Medical Center, Department of Orthopedics, 2409 Cherry St, Suite #10, Toledo, OH 43608, United States.
  • Eaddy S; Mercy Health St. Vincent Medical Center, Department of Orthopedics, 2409 Cherry St, Suite #10, Toledo, OH 43608, United States.
  • Stegelmann SD; HCA Medical City Healthcare UNT-TCU GME (Denton), 3535 S Interstate 35, Denton, TX 76210, United States.
  • Skrobot G; Mercy Health St. Vincent Medical Center, Department of Orthopedics, 2409 Cherry St, Suite #10, Toledo, OH 43608, United States.
  • Andreshak T; Mercy Health St. Vincent Medical Center, Department of Orthopedics, 2409 Cherry St, Suite #10, Toledo, OH 43608, United States.
N Am Spine Soc J ; 17: 100295, 2024 Mar.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38204918
ABSTRACT

Background:

Venous thromboembolism (VTE), including deep vein thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary embolism (PE), is a potentially devastating complication after surgery. Spine surgery is associated with an increased risk of postoperative bleeding, such as spinal epidural hematomas (SEH), which complicates the use of anticoagulation. Despite this dilemma, there is a lack of consensus around perioperative VTE prophylaxis. This systematic review investigates the relationship between chemoprophylaxis and the incidence rates of VTE and SEH in the elective spine surgical population.

Methods:

A comprehensive literature search was performed using PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane databases to identify studies published after 2,000 that compared VTE chemoprophylaxis use in elective spine surgery. Studies involving patients aged < 18 years or with known trauma, cancer, or spinal cord injuries were excluded. Pooled incidence rates of VTE and SEH were calculated for all eligible studies, and meta-analyses were performed to assess the relationship between chemoprophylaxis and the incidences of VTE and SEH.

Results:

Nineteen studies met our eligibility criteria, comprising a total of 220,932 patients. The overall pooled incidence of VTE was 3.2%, including 3.3% for DVT and 0.4% for PE. A comparison of VTE incidence between patients that did and did not receive chemoprophylaxis was not statistically significant (OR 0.97, p=.95, 95% CI 0.43-2.19). The overall pooled incidence of SEH was 0.4%, and there was also no significant difference between patients that did and did not receive chemoprophylaxis (OR 1.57, p=.06, 95% CI 0.99-2.50).

Conclusions:

The use of perioperative chemoprophylaxis may not significantly alter rates of VTE or SEH in the elective spine surgery population. This review highlights the need for additional randomized controlled trials to better define the risks and benefits of specific chemoprophylactic protocols in various subpopulations of elective spine surgery.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Prognostic_studies / Systematic_reviews Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Prognostic_studies / Systematic_reviews Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article