Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Multidimensional factors of burnout in general practice: a cross sectional survey.
Bayot, Marie; Boone, Anke; Godderis, Lode; Lenoir, Anne-Laure.
Afiliação
  • Bayot M; Department of Clinical Sciences, Université de Liège, Liège, Belgium marie.bayot@uliege.be.
  • Boone A; Centre for Environment and Health, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
  • Godderis L; Centre for Environment and Health, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
  • Lenoir AL; Idewe, External Service for Prevention and Protection at Work, Heverlee, Belgium.
BJGP Open ; 2024 May 14.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38253400
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

GPs are particularly vulnerable to job burnout. Tailored prevention and intervention strategies are needed.

AIM:

To investigate organisational, interpersonal, and individual factors contributing to exhaustion and disengagement at work among GPs. DESIGN &

SETTING:

We conducted a cross-sectional study in a sample of Belgian GPs.

METHOD:

A total of 358 doctors (73% females, 301 with complete data) completed an online anonymous questionnaire assessing job burnout, psychosocial characteristics of the work environment, perceived social support in the private domain, emotional competence, and self-compassion.

RESULTS:

GPs reported moderate levels of exhaustion and disengagement. Regression models showed that included factors jointly explained 69% of the variance in exhaustion and 63% in disengagement. Exhaustion was significantly predicted by female sex (ß effect size = -0.1), high perceived emotional demands (ß = 0.19), as well as low self-compassion (ß = -0.14) and low emotional competence (ß = 0.09). Disengagement was significantly predicted by low seniority (ß = -0.12) and limited opportunities for development (ß = -0.16). Both exhaustion and disengagement were predicted by low perceived quality of work (ß = -0.19 and -0.14, respectively), meaning of work (ß = -0.17 and -0.31, respectively), and role clarity (ß = 0.09 and 0.12, respectively), as well as high perceived work-life conflict (ß = 0.46 and 0.21, respectively). Moreover, GPs working in a multidisciplinary group reported lower levels of exhaustion and disengagement than those working in a monodisciplinary group or a solo practice, and this difference was associated with factors such as work-life conflict.

CONCLUSION:

Organisational, interpersonal, and intrapersonal factors interact to predict a substantial part of burnout in general practice. The most significant risk factors were perceived work-life conflict and poor meaning of work. Policymakers should work to support more sustainable practices based on the specific needs and constraints reported by GPs.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Observational_studies / Prevalence_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Observational_studies / Prevalence_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article