Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Deep learning-guided adjuvant chemotherapy selection for elderly patients with breast cancer.
Zhu, Enzhao; Zhang, Linmei; Wang, Jiayi; Hu, Chunyu; Pan, Huiqing; Shi, Weizhong; Xu, Ziqin; Ai, Pu; Shan, Dan; Ai, Zisheng.
Afiliação
  • Zhu E; School of Medicine, Tongji University, Shanghai, China.
  • Zhang L; Department of Periodontics, Stomatological Hospital and Dental School of Tongji University, Shanghai Engineering Research Center of Tooth Restoration and Regeneration, Shanghai, China.
  • Wang J; School of Medicine, Tongji University, Shanghai, China.
  • Hu C; School of Medicine, Tenth People's Hospital of Tongji University, Shanghai, China.
  • Pan H; School of Medicine, Tongji University, Shanghai, China.
  • Shi W; Shanghai Hospital Development Center, Shanghai, China.
  • Xu Z; Columbia University, New York, NY, USA.
  • Ai P; School of Medicine, Tongji University, Shanghai, China.
  • Shan D; Columbia University, New York, NY, USA.
  • Ai Z; National University of Ireland, Galway, Ireland.
Breast Cancer Res Treat ; 205(1): 97-107, 2024 May.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38294615
ABSTRACT

PURPOSE:

The efficacy of adjuvant chemotherapy in elderly breast cancer patients is currently controversial. This study aims to provide personalized adjuvant chemotherapy recommendations using deep learning (DL).

METHODS:

Six models with various causal inference approaches were trained to make individualized chemotherapy recommendations. Patients who received actual treatment recommended by DL models were compared with those who did not. Inverse probability treatment weighting (IPTW) was used to reduce bias. Linear regression, IPTW-adjusted risk difference (RD), and SurvSHAP(t) were used to interpret the best model.

RESULTS:

A total of 5352 elderly breast cancer patients were included. The median (interquartile range) follow-up time was 52 (30-80) months. Among all models, the balanced individual treatment effect for survival data (BITES) performed best. Treatment according to following BITES recommendations was associated with survival benefit, with a multivariate hazard ratio (HR) of 0.78 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.64-0.94), IPTW-adjusted HR of 0.74 (95% CI 0.59-0.93), RD of 12.40% (95% CI 8.01-16.90%), IPTW-adjusted RD of 11.50% (95% CI 7.16-15.80%), difference in restricted mean survival time (dRMST) of 12.44 (95% CI 8.28-16.60) months, IPTW-adjusted dRMST of 7.81 (95% CI 2.93-11.93) months, and p value of the IPTW-adjusted Log-rank test of 0.033. By interpreting BITES, the debiased impact of patient characteristics on adjuvant chemotherapy was quantified, which mainly included breast cancer subtype, tumor size, number of positive lymph nodes, TNM stages, histological grades, and surgical type.

CONCLUSION:

Our results emphasize the potential of DL models in guiding adjuvant chemotherapy decisions for elderly breast cancer patients.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Guideline / Prognostic_studies Limite: Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Guideline / Prognostic_studies Limite: Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article