Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
A computer-aided polyp detection system in screening and surveillance colonoscopy: an international, multicentre, randomised, tandem trial.
Maas, Michiel H J; Neumann, Helmut; Shirin, Haim; Katz, Lior H; Benson, Ariel A; Kahloon, Arslan; Soons, Elsa; Hazzan, Rawi; Landsman, Marc J; Lebwohl, Benjamin; Lewis, Suzanne K; Sivanathan, Visvakanth; Ngamruengphong, Saowanee; Jacob, Harold; Siersema, Peter D.
Afiliação
  • Maas MHJ; Department of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, Netherlands. Electronic address: michiel.maas@radboudumc.nl.
  • Neumann H; University Medical Center Mainz, Interventional Endoscopy Center, I Medizinische Klinik und Poliklinik, Mainz, Germany.
  • Shirin H; Institute of Gastroenterology and Liver Diseases, Shamir (Assaf Harofeh) Medical Center, Zerifin, Israel.
  • Katz LH; Hadassah Medical Center and Faculty of Medicine, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Institute of Gastroenterology and Liver Diseases, Jerusalem, Israel.
  • Benson AA; Hadassah Medical Center and Faculty of Medicine, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Institute of Gastroenterology and Liver Diseases, Jerusalem, Israel.
  • Kahloon A; College of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology, University of Tennessee, Chattanooga, TN, USA.
  • Soons E; Department of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, Netherlands.
  • Hazzan R; Assuta Centers, Haifa Gastroenterology Institute, Haifa, Israel.
  • Landsman MJ; Department of Gastroenterology, MetroHealth Medical Center, Cleveland, OH, USA.
  • Lebwohl B; Department of Gastroenterology, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, USA.
  • Lewis SK; Department of Gastroenterology, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, USA.
  • Sivanathan V; University Medical Center Mainz, Interventional Endoscopy Center, I Medizinische Klinik und Poliklinik, Mainz, Germany.
  • Ngamruengphong S; Department of Gastroenterology, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA.
  • Jacob H; Hadassah Medical Center and Faculty of Medicine, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Institute of Gastroenterology and Liver Diseases, Jerusalem, Israel.
  • Siersema PD; Department of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, Netherlands; Department of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands.
Lancet Digit Health ; 6(3): e157-e165, 2024 Mar.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38395537
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Studies on the effect of computer-aided detection (CAD) in a daily clinical screening and surveillance colonoscopy population practice are scarce. The aim of this study was to evaluate a novel CAD system in a screening and surveillance colonoscopy population.

METHODS:

This multicentre, randomised, controlled trial was done in ten hospitals in Europe, the USA, and Israel by 31 endoscopists. Patients referred for non-immunochemical faecal occult blood test (iFOBT) screening or surveillance colonoscopy were included. Patients were randomomly assigned to CAD-assisted colonoscopy or conventional colonoscopy; a subset was further randomly assigned to undergo tandem colonoscopy CAD followed by conventional colonoscopy or conventional colonoscopy followed by CAD. Primary objectives included adenoma per colonoscopy (APC) and adenoma per extraction (APE). Secondary objectives included adenoma miss rate (AMR) in the tandem colonoscopies. The study was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04640792.

FINDINGS:

A total of 916 patients were included in the modified intention-to-treat

analysis:

449 in the CAD group and 467 in the conventional colonoscopy group. APC was higher with CAD compared with conventional colonoscopy (0·70 vs 0·51, p=0·015; 314 adenomas per 449 colonoscopies vs 238 adenomas per 467 colonoscopies; poisson effect ratio 1·372 [95% CI 1·068-1·769]), while showing non-inferiority of APE compared with conventional colonoscopy (0·59 vs 0·66; p<0·001 for non-inferiority; 314 of 536 extractions vs 238 of 360 extractions). AMR in the 127 (61 with CAD first, 66 with conventional colonoscopy first) patients completing tandem colonoscopy was 19% (11 of 59 detected during the second pass) in the CAD first group and 36% (16 of 45 detected during the second pass) in the conventional colonoscopy first group (p=0·024).

INTERPRETATION:

CAD increased adenoma detection in non-iFOBT screening and surveillance colonoscopies and reduced adenoma miss rates compared with conventional colonoscopy, without an increase in the resection of non-adenomatous lesions.

FUNDING:

Magentiq Eye.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Limite: Animals / Humans País/Região como assunto: Europa Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Limite: Animals / Humans País/Região como assunto: Europa Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article