Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Patient experiences and perceived value of genetic testing in inherited retinal diseases: a cross-sectional survey.
Britten-Jones, Alexis Ceecee; Schultz, Joshua; Mack, Heather G; Kearns, Lisa S; Huq, Aamira J; Ruddle, Jonathan B; Mackey, David A; Hewitt, Alex W; Edwards, Thomas L; Ayton, Lauren N.
Afiliação
  • Britten-Jones AC; Department of Optometry and Vision Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, 3010, Australia. ac.brittenjones@unimelb.edu.au.
  • Schultz J; Centre for Eye Research Australia, Royal Victorian Eye and Ear Hospital, Melbourne, Australia. ac.brittenjones@unimelb.edu.au.
  • Mack HG; Department of Surgery (Ophthalmology), Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia. ac.brittenjones@unimelb.edu.au.
  • Kearns LS; Department of Genomic Medicine, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Parkville, VIC, Australia.
  • Huq AJ; Centre for Eye Research Australia, Royal Victorian Eye and Ear Hospital, Melbourne, Australia.
  • Ruddle JB; Department of Surgery (Ophthalmology), Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia.
  • Mackey DA; Centre for Eye Research Australia, Royal Victorian Eye and Ear Hospital, Melbourne, Australia.
  • Hewitt AW; Department of Surgery (Ophthalmology), Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia.
  • Edwards TL; Department of Genomic Medicine, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Parkville, VIC, Australia.
  • Ayton LN; Department of Medicine, University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, Australia.
Sci Rep ; 14(1): 5403, 2024 03 05.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38443430
ABSTRACT
This study evaluated patient experiences with genetic testing for inherited retinal diseases (IRDs) and the association between underlying knowledge, testing outcomes, and the perceived value of the results. An online survey was distributed to adults with IRDs and parents/guardians of dependents with IRDs who had had genetic testing. Data included details of genetic testing, pre- and post- test perceptions, Decision Regret Scale, perceived value of results, and knowledge of gene therapy. Of 135 responses (85% from adults with IRDs), genetic testing was primarily conducted at no charge through public hospitals (49%) or in a research setting (30%). Key motivations for genetic testing were to confirm IRD diagnosis and to contribute towards research. Those who had received a genetic diagnosis (odds ratio 6.71; p < 0.001) and those self-reported to have good knowledge of gene therapy (odds ratio 2.69; p = 0.018) were more likely to have gained confidence in managing their clinical care. For over 80% of respondents, knowing the causative gene empowered them to learn more about their IRD and explore opportunities regarding clinical trials. Key genetic counselling information needs include resources for family communications, structured information provision, and ongoing genetic support, particularly in the context of emerging ocular therapies, to enhance consistency in information uptake.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Limite: Adult / Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Limite: Adult / Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article