Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Total IgE as a biomarker of omalizumab response in chronic spontaneous urticaria: A meta-analysis.
Keller, Levi; Perera, Ekta K; Bindon, Brittany; Khatiwada, Aastha; Stitt, Jenny M; Dreskin, Stephen C.
Afiliação
  • Keller L; From the Division of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, Department of Medicine, University of Colorado Denver School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado.
  • Perera EK; Division of Pulmonary and Sleep Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, Texas.
  • Bindon B; Division of Pediatric Allergy and Immunology, Department of Pediatrics, University of Chicago Medicine, Chicago, Illinois, and.
  • Khatiwada A; Division of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, National Jewish Health, Denver, Colorado.
  • Stitt JM; From the Division of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, Department of Medicine, University of Colorado Denver School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado.
  • Dreskin SC; From the Division of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, Department of Medicine, University of Colorado Denver School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado.
Allergy Asthma Proc ; 45(2): 97-99, 2024 Mar 01.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38449010
ABSTRACT

Background:

Omalizumab is approved for the treatment of chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU) that is refractory to antihistamines. Total immunoglobulin E (IgE) levels have emerged as a possible biomarker to predict response to omalizumab. However, the existing literature is heterogenous, with conflicting conclusions with regard to the role of total IgE levels.

Objective:

We sought to clarify the role of evaluating total IgE levels in patients with CSU by performing a meta-analysis on the existing literature to determine if meaningful changes exist between responders and nonresponders to omalizumab.

Methods:

A total of 68 unique citations were returned and screened by two independent reviewers. Editorials, reviews, and case reports were excluded, and a total of 33 original articles were identified and underwent secondary evaluation. Studies that present mean ± standard deviation total IgE levels and/or 95% confidence intervals (CI) were included, whereas studies with < 25 subjects were excluded. Three studies ultimately met these criteria.

Results:

We found a mean difference in total IgE levels between those who responded to omalizumab versus those without a response of 49.76 (95% CI, 7.13-92.38; p = 0.02), which demonstrated higher mean IgE values in responders compared with nonresponders.

Conclusion:

This study presents additional evidence that supports evaluation of total IgE levels as it pertains to response to omalizumab therapy in CSU. When considering the current evidence, it seems reasonable to consider the baseline total IgE level as a biomarker to predict the treatment response to omalizumab. Based on the existing literature, we cannot conclude at what threshold nonresponse is more likely to occur.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Limite: Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Limite: Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article