Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
What is the environmental impact of a blood transfusion? A life cycle assessment of transfusion services across England.
Hibbs, Stephen P; Thomas, Stephen; Agarwal, Nikhil; Andrews, Charlotte; Eskander, Sylvia; Abdalla, Aaliyah Sharif; Staves, Julie; Eckelman, Matthew J; Murphy, Michael F.
Afiliação
  • Hibbs SP; Wolfson Institute of Population Health, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK.
  • Thomas S; NHS Blood and Transplant, London, UK.
  • Agarwal N; Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Northeastern University, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
  • Andrews C; Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Northeastern University, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
  • Eskander S; Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Northeastern University, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
  • Abdalla AS; NHS Blood and Transplant, London, UK.
  • Staves J; Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK.
  • Eckelman MJ; Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Northeastern University, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
  • Murphy MF; NHS Blood and Transplant, London, UK.
Transfusion ; 64(4): 638-645, 2024 Apr.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38506497
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Healthcare activities significantly contribute to greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. Blood transfusions require complex, interlinked processes to collect, manufacture, and supply. Their contribution to healthcare emissions and avenues for mitigation is unknown. STUDY DESIGN AND

METHODS:

We performed a life cycle assessment (LCA) for red blood cell (RBC) transfusions across England where 1.36 million units are transfused annually. We defined the process flow with seven categories donation, transportation, manufacturing, testing, stockholding, hospital transfusion, and disposal. We used direct measurements, manufacturer data, bioengineering databases, and surveys to assess electrical power usage, embodied carbon in disposable materials and reagents, and direct emissions through transportation, refrigerant leakage, and disposal.

RESULTS:

The central estimate of carbon footprint per unit of RBC transfused was 7.56 kg CO2 equivalent (CO2eq). The largest contribution was from transportation (2.8 kg CO2eq, 36% of total). The second largest was from hospital transfusion processes (1.9 kg CO2eq, 26%), driven mostly by refrigeration. The third largest was donation (1.3 kg CO2eq, 17%) due to the plastic blood packs. Total emissions from RBC transfusion are ~10.3 million kg CO2eq/year.

DISCUSSION:

This is the first study to estimate GHG emissions attributable to RBC transfusion, quantifying the contributions of each stage of the process. Primary areas for mitigation may include electric vehicles for the blood service fleet, improving the energy efficiency of refrigeration, using renewable sources of electricity, changing the plastic of blood packs, and using methods of disposal other than incineration.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Limite: Animals / Humans País/Região como assunto: Europa Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Limite: Animals / Humans País/Região como assunto: Europa Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article