Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Aligning the principles and practice of research integrity and research fairness in global health: a mixed-methods study.
Sempa, Joseph Bukulu; Patil, Rutuja; Mathewson, Jake D; Kabelka, Hannah; Yaghmaei, Nima; Coleman, Harry; Sohoni, Preeti; Straetemans, Masja; Gopalakrishna, Gowri; Wienia, Martijn; Kombe, Francis; Alba, Sandra.
Afiliação
  • Sempa JB; Faculty of Health Sciences, Department of Biostatistics, University of the Free State, Bloemfontein, South Africa sempajb@ufs.ac.za.
  • Patil R; Vadu Rural Health Program, KEM Hospital Research Centre Pune, Pune, Maharashtra, India.
  • Mathewson JD; KIT Royal Tropical Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
  • Kabelka H; KIT Royal Tropical Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
  • Yaghmaei N; KIT Royal Tropical Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
  • Coleman H; KIT Royal Tropical Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
  • Sohoni P; Vadu Rural Health Program, KEM Hospital Research Centre Pune, Pune, Maharashtra, India.
  • Straetemans M; KIT Royal Tropical Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
  • Gopalakrishna G; Faculty of Health, Medicine and Life Sciences, Maastricht University, Maastricht, Netherlands.
  • Wienia M; NWO-WOTRO Science for Global Development, The Hague, The Netherlands.
  • Kombe F; EthiXPERT Proprietary NPC, Wierdapark, Pretoria, South Africa.
  • Alba S; KIT Royal Tropical Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
BMJ Glob Health ; 9(3)2024 Mar 22.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38519097
ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION:

In the past decade, global health research has seen a growing emphasis on research integrity and fairness. The concept of research integrity emerged in response to the reproducibility crisis in science during the late 2000s. Research fairness initiatives aim to enhance ownership and inclusivity in research involving partners with varying powers, decision-making roles and resource capacities, ultimately prioritising local health research needs. Despite extensive academic discussions, empirical data on these aspects, especially in the context of global health, remain limited.

METHODS:

To address this gap, we conducted a mixed-methods study focusing on research integrity and fairness. The study included an online frequency survey and in-depth key informant interviews with researchers from international research networks. The dual objectives were to quantify the frequency of practices related to research integrity and fairness and explore the determinants influencing these practices in global health.

RESULTS:

Out of 145 participants in the quantitative survey (8.4% response rate), findings indicate that global health researchers generally adhere to principles of research integrity and fairness, with variations in reported behaviours. The study identified structural, institutional and individual factors influencing these patterns, including donor landscape rigidity, institutional investments in relationship building, guidelines, mentoring and power differentials among researchers.

CONCLUSION:

This research highlights that, despite some variations, there is a substantial alignment between research integrity and fairness, with both sharing similar determinants and the overarching goal of enhancing research quality and societal benefits. The study emphasises the potential to explicitly recognise and leverage these synergies, aligning both agendas to further advance global health research.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Limite: Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Limite: Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article