Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Factors Influencing Optimal Bracing Compliance in Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis: A Single Center Prospective Cohort Study.
Asada, Tomoyuki; Kotani, Toshiaki; Sakuma, Tsuyoshi; Iijima, Yasushi; Sakashita, Kotaro; Ogata, Yosuke; Akazawa, Tsutomu; Minami, Shohei; Ohtori, Seiji; Koda, Masao; Yamazaki, Masashi.
Afiliação
  • Asada T; Department of Orthopedic surgery, Seirei Sakura Citizen Hospital, Sakura, Japan.
  • Kotani T; Department of Orthopedic surgery, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Japan.
  • Sakuma T; Department of Spine surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, USA.
  • Iijima Y; Department of Orthopedic surgery, Seirei Sakura Citizen Hospital, Sakura, Japan.
  • Sakashita K; Department of Orthopedic surgery, Seirei Sakura Citizen Hospital, Sakura, Japan.
  • Ogata Y; Department of Orthopedic surgery, Seirei Sakura Citizen Hospital, Sakura, Japan.
  • Akazawa T; Department of Orthopedic surgery, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Japan.
  • Minami S; Department of Orthopedic surgery, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Japan.
  • Ohtori S; Department of Orthopedic surgery, St. Marianna University School of Medicine, Kawasaki, Japan.
  • Koda M; Department of Orthopedic surgery, Seirei Sakura Citizen Hospital, Sakura, Japan.
  • Yamazaki M; Department of Orthopedic surgery, Chiba University, Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba, Japan.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38597189
ABSTRACT
STUDY

DESIGN:

Retrospective cohort study.

OBJECTIVE:

To identify factors contributing to optimal bracing compliance in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS). SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA Poor brace compliance is a key factor affecting brace treatment success in AIS. Predictive factors influencing optimal brace compliance to achieve brace treatment success remain unknown. MATERIALS AND

METHODS:

This study included AIS patients, aged 10-15, with a Cobb angle of 20-40 degrees. Demographics data, radiographic assessments, and patient-reported outcomes (including the SRS-22r patient questionnaire) were collected. Brace compliance was monitored using in-brace thermometers, defining optimal bracing time as more than 18 hours/day. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was employed to identify predictors of optimal bracing time from the demographic and patient- reported outcomes score before bracing.

RESULTS:

Among 122 patients, 59.0% achieved optimal bracing time by six months. The achieved group indicated higher scores in satisfaction domain before bracing (3.3±0.7 vs. 3.1±0.6; P=0.034). Multivariable logistic regression analysis demonstrated that Satisfaction domain before bracing was an independent factor associated with achievement of the optimal bracing time (OR 1.97 [95%CI 1.00 - 3.89], P=0.049). The model with bracing at 1-month follow-up also demonstrated the bracing at 1-month was a significant factor (OR 1.52 [95%CI 1.30 - 1.79], P<0.001).

CONCLUSION:

Optimal bracing compliance in AIS is significantly influenced by pre-bracing satisfaction and brace compliance at earlier time point. These findings highlight the need to address psychological factors and early compliance in AIS bracing treatment. SRS-22r can be useful to identify the need for psychological support.

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article