Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Evaluation of objective and subjective binocular ocular refraction with looking in type.
Fukushima, Megumi; Hirota, Masakazu; Yukimori, Takafumi; Hayashi, Akio; Hirohara, Yoko; Saika, Makoto; Matsuoka, Kumiko.
Afiliação
  • Fukushima M; Division of Orthoptics, Graduate School of Medical Care and Technology, Teikyo University, Itabashi, Tokyo, Japan.
  • Hirota M; Department of Orthoptics, Faculty of Medical Technology, Teikyo University, 2-11-1 Kaga, Itabashi, 173-8605, Itabashi, Tokyo, Japan. hirota.ortho@med.teikyo-u.ac.jp.
  • Yukimori T; Department of Ophthalmology, School of Medicine, Teikyo University, Itabashi, Tokyo, Japan. hirota.ortho@med.teikyo-u.ac.jp.
  • Hayashi A; Topcon Corporation, Itabashi, Tokyo, Japan.
  • Hirohara Y; Topcon Corporation, Itabashi, Tokyo, Japan.
  • Saika M; Topcon Corporation, Itabashi, Tokyo, Japan.
  • Matsuoka K; Topcon Corporation, Itabashi, Tokyo, Japan.
BMC Ophthalmol ; 24(1): 170, 2024 Apr 16.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38627750
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

This study aimed to compare the results of the Chronos binocular/monocular refraction system, that measures objective and subjective ocular refraction in one unit, to objective findings obtained from a conventional autorefractometer and a conventional subjective ocular refraction using a trial-frame in real space.

METHODS:

Twenty-eight healthy volunteers (21.2 ± 1.5 years old) were included in this study. Objective ocular refraction was measured using two tests the Chronos binocular/monocular refraction system under binocular conditions and a conventional autorefractometer under monocular conditions. Subjective ocular refraction was measured using three tests Chronos binocular/monocular refraction system under binocular, monocular conditions, and trial-frame in the real space under monocular conditions. The measurement distance was set to 5.0 m for each test. All ocular refractions were converted into spherical equivalents (SEs).

RESULTS:

The objective SE was significantly more negative with Chronos binocular/monocular refraction system under binocular condition (- 4.08 ± 2.76 D) than with the conventional autorefractometer under monocular condition (- 3.85 ± 2.66 D) (P = 0.002). Although, the subjective SE was significantly more negative with Chronos binocular/monocular refraction system under binocular condition (- 3.55 ± 2.67 D) than with the trial-frame in the real space under monocular condition (- 3.33 ± 2.75 D) (P = 0.002), Chronos binocular/monocular refraction system under monocular condition (- 3.17 ± 2.57 D) was not significantly different from that in trial-frame in real space under monocular condition (P = 0.33).

CONCLUSION:

These findings suggest that the Chronos binocular/monocular refraction system, which can complete both objective and subjective ocular refraction tests in a single unit, is suitable for screening ocular refraction, although it produces slightly more myopic results. Furthermore, subjective ocular refraction testing accuracy in Chronos binocular/monocular refraction system can be equivalent to trial-frame in real-space testing by switching from binocular to monocular condition.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Limite: Adult / Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Limite: Adult / Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article