Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
The role of urology and radiology in prostate biopsy: current trends and future perspectives.
Mac Curtain, Benjamin M; Temperley, Hugo C; Kelly, John A O; Ryan, James; Qian, Wanyang; O'Sullivan, Niall; Breen, Kieran J; Mc Carthy, Colin J; Brennan, Ian; Davis, Niall F.
Afiliação
  • Mac Curtain BM; Department of Urology, St Vincent's University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland. b.m.maccurtain@gmail.com.
  • Temperley HC; Department of Radiology, St James Hospital, Dublin, Ireland.
  • Kelly JAO; Department of Urology, St Vincent's University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland.
  • Ryan J; Department of Radiology, St Vincent's University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland.
  • Qian W; Dept of Surgery, St John of God Midland Hospital, Midland, WA, USA.
  • O'Sullivan N; Department of Radiology, St James Hospital, Dublin, Ireland.
  • Breen KJ; Department of Urology, St Vincent's University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland.
  • Mc Carthy CJ; Department of Radiology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Centre, Boston, MA, USA.
  • Brennan I; Department of Radiology, St James Hospital, Dublin, Ireland.
  • Davis NF; Department of Urology, Beaumont Hospital, Dublin, Ireland.
World J Urol ; 42(1): 249, 2024 Apr 22.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38649544
ABSTRACT

PURPOSE:

Prostate biopsy is central to the accurate histological diagnosis of prostate cancer. In current practice, the biopsy procedure can be performed using a transrectal or transperineal route with different technologies available for targeting of lesions within the prostate. Historically, the biopsy procedure was performed solely by urologists, but with the advent of image-guided techniques, the involvement of radiologists in prostate biopsy has become more common. Herein, we discuss the pros, cons and future considerations regarding their ongoing role.

METHODS:

A narrative review regarding the current evidence was completed. PubMed and Cochrane central register of controlled trials were search until January 2024. All study types were of consideration if published after 2000 and an English language translation was available.

RESULTS:

There are no published studies that directly compare outcomes of prostate biopsy when performed by a urologist or radiologist. In all published studies regarding the learning curve for prostate biopsy, the procedure was performed by urologists. These studies suggest that the learning curve for prostate biopsy is between 10 and 50 cases to reach proficiency in terms of prostate cancer detection and complications. It is recognised that many urologists are poorly able to accurately interpret multi parametric (mp)-MRI of the prostate. Collaboration between the specialities is of importance with urology offering the advantage of being involved in prior and future care of the patient while radiology has the advantage of being able to expertly interpret preprocedure MRI.

CONCLUSION:

There is no evidence to suggest that prostate biopsy should be solely performed by a specific specialty. The most important factor remains knowledge of the relevant anatomy and sufficient volume of cases to develop and maintain skills.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Limite: Humans / Male Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Limite: Humans / Male Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article