Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Two-Year Results of Ceramic-on-Ceramic Hip Resurfacing in an International Multicenter Cohort.
Lin, David; Xu, Joshua; Weinrauch, Patrick; Young, David A; De Smet, Koen; Manktelow, Andrew; Beaulé, Paul E; Walter, William L.
Afiliação
  • Lin D; Department of Orthopaedics and Trauma Surgery, Royal North Shore Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
  • Xu J; Department of Orthopaedics and Trauma Surgery, Royal North Shore Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
  • Weinrauch P; Brisbane Hip Clinic, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
  • Young DA; Melbourne Orthopaedic Group, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
  • De Smet K; ANCA Medical Centre, Ghent, Belgium.
  • Manktelow A; Department of Trauma and Orthopaedics, Queens Medical Centre, Nottingham, UK.
  • Beaulé PE; Orthopaedic Department, The Ottawa Hospital, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
  • Walter WL; Department of Orthopaedics and Trauma Surgery, Royal North Shore Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia; Sydney Muskuloskeletal Health, Kolling Institute, Northern Clinical School, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
J Arthroplasty ; 39(11): 2800-2806, 2024 Nov.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38782243
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Hip resurfacing arthroplasty (HRA) is a bone-conserving alternative to total hip arthroplasty. We present the 2-year clinical and radiographic follow-up of a novel ceramic-on-ceramic HRA in an international multicenter cohort.

METHODS:

Patients undergoing HRA between September 2018 and January 2021 were prospectively included. Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) in the form of the Forgotten Joint Score, Hip Disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score Jr., Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index, Oxford Hip Score, and University of California, Los Angeles, Activity Score were collected preoperatively, and at 1 and 2 years postoperation. Serial radiographs were assessed for migration, component alignment, evidence of osteolysis or loosening, and heterotopic ossification formation.

RESULTS:

The study identified 200 patients who reached a minimum 2-year follow-up (mean 3.5 years). Of these, 185 completed PROMs follow-up at 2 years. There was a significant improvement in Hip Disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (P < .001) and Oxford Hip Score (P < .001) between the preoperative, 1-year, and 2-year outcomes. Patients had improved activity scores on the University of California, Los Angeles, Active Score (P < .001), with 45% reporting a return to high-impact activity at 2 years. At 1 and 2 years, the Forgotten Joint Score was not significantly different (P = .38). There was no migration, osteolysis, or loosening of any of the implants. No fractures were reported over the 2-year follow-up, with only 1 patient reporting a sciatic nerve palsy. There were 2 revisions, 1 for unexplained pain at 3 months due to acetabular component malposition and 1 at 33.5 months for acetabular implant failure.

CONCLUSIONS:

The ceramic-on-ceramic resurfacing at 2 years postoperation demonstrates promising results with satisfactory outcomes in all recorded PROMs. Further long-term data are needed to support the widespread adoption of this prosthesis as an alternative to other HRA bearings.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Limite: Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Limite: Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article