Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Contemporary Trends and Outcomes of Intravascular Lithotripsy in Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: Insights From BMC2.
Sukul, Devraj; Seth, Milan; Madder, Ryan D; Basir, Mir B; Menees, Daniel S; Kaki, Amir; Azzalini, Lorenzo; Lee, Daniel; Gurm, Hitinder S.
Afiliação
  • Sukul D; Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA; Veterans Affairs Ann Arbor Healthcare System, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA. Electronic address: dsukul@med.umich.edu.
  • Seth M; Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.
  • Madder RD; Frederik Meijer Heart and Vascular Institute, Corewell Health, Grand Rapids, Michigan, USA.
  • Basir MB; Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, Michigan, USA.
  • Menees DS; Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.
  • Kaki A; Division of Cardiology, Ascension St. John Hospital, Detroit, Michigan, USA.
  • Azzalini L; Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA.
  • Lee D; Division of Cardiology, McLaren Bay Region, Bay City, Michigan, USA.
  • Gurm HS; Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38970579
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

With an aging population and an increase in the comorbidity burden of patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), the management of coronary calcification for optimal PCI is critical in contemporary practice.

OBJECTIVES:

This study sought to examine the trends and outcomes of coronary intravascular lithotripsy (IVL), rotational/orbital atherectomy, or both among patients who underwent PCI in Michigan.

METHODS:

We included all PCIs between January 1, 2021, and June 30, 2022, performed at 48 Michigan hospitals. Outcomes included in-hospital major adverse cardiac events (MACEs) and procedural success.

RESULTS:

IVL was used in 1,090 patients (2.57%), atherectomy was used in 1,743 (4.10%) patients, and both were used in 240 patients (0.57% of all PCIs). IVL use increased from 0.04% of PCI cases in January 2021 to 4.28% of cases in June 2022, ultimately exceeding the rate of atherectomy use. The rate of MACEs (4.3% vs 5.4%; P = 0.23) and procedural success (89.4% vs 89.1%; P = 0.88) were similar among patients treated with IVL compared with atherectomy, respectively. Only 15.6% of patients treated with IVL in contemporary practice were similar to the population enrolled in the pivotal IVL trials. Among such patients (n = 169), the rate of MACEs (0.0%) and procedural success (94.7%) were similar to the outcomes reported in the pivotal IVL trials.

CONCLUSIONS:

Since its introduction in February 2021, coronary IVL use has steadily increased, exceeding atherectomy use in Michigan by February 2022. Contemporary use of IVL and atherectomy is generally associated with high rates of procedural success and low rates of complications.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article