Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Readability of online patient education material for foregut surgery.
Chang, Michelle; Weiss, Barry; Worrell, Stephanie; Hsu, Chiu-Hsieh; Ghaderi, Iman.
Afiliação
  • Chang M; College of Medicine, Department of Surgery, University of Arizona, Tucson, USA. michelleechang22@gmail.com.
  • Weiss B; College of Medicine, Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of Arizona, Tucson, USA.
  • Worrell S; College of Medicine, Department of Surgery, University of Arizona, Tucson, USA.
  • Hsu CH; College of Public Health, Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of Arizona, Tucson, USA.
  • Ghaderi I; College of Medicine, Department of Surgery, University of Arizona, Tucson, USA.
Surg Endosc ; 38(9): 5259-5265, 2024 Sep.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39009725
ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION:

Health literacy is the ability of individuals to use basic health information and services to make well-informed decisions. Low health literacy among surgical patients has been associated with nonadherence to preoperative and/or discharge instructions as well as poor comprehension of surgery. It likely poses as a barrier to patients considering foregut surgery which requires an understanding of different treatment options and specific diet instructions. The objective of this study was to assess and compare the readability of online patient education materials (PEM) for foregut surgery.

METHODS:

Using Google, the terms "anti-reflux surgery, "GERD surgery," and "foregut surgery" were searched and a total of 30 webpages from universities and national organizations were selected. The readability of the text was assessed with seven instruments Flesch Reading Ease formula (FRE), Gunning Fog (GF), Flesch-Kincaid Grade Level (FKGL), Coleman Liau Index (CL), Simple Measure of Gobbledygook (SMOG), Automated Readability Index (ARI), and Linsear Write Formula (LWF). Mean readability scores were calculated with standard deviations. We performed a qualitative analysis gathering characteristics such as, type of information (preoperative or postoperative), organization, use of multimedia, inclusion of a version in another language.

RESULTS:

The overall average readability of the top PEM for foregut surgery was 12th grade. There was only one resource at the recommended sixth grade reading level. Nearly half of PEM included some form of multimedia.

CONCLUSIONS:

The American Medical Association and National Institute of Health have recommended that PEMs to be written at the 5th-6th grade level. The majority of online PEM for foregut surgery is above the recommended reading level. This may be a barrier for patients seeking foregut surgery. Surgeons should be aware of the potential gaps in understanding of their patients to help them make informed decisions and improve overall health outcomes.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Limite: Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Limite: Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article