Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Docetaxel plus S-1 versus docetaxel plus capecitabine as first-line treatment for advanced breast cancer patients: a prospective randomized phase II study.
Abudureheiyimu, Nilupai; Wu, Yun; Li, Qing; Zhang, Pin; Ma, Fei; Yuan, Peng; Luo, Yang; Fan, Ying; Chen, Shanshan; Cai, Ruigang; Li, Qiao; Han, Yiqun; Xu, Hangcheng; Wang, Yan; Wang, Jiayu; Xu, Binghe.
Afiliação
  • Abudureheiyimu N; Department of Medical Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
  • Wu Y; Department of Medical Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
  • Li Q; Department of Medical Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
  • Zhang P; Department of Medical Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
  • Ma F; Department of Medical Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
  • Yuan P; Department of VIP Medical Services, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
  • Luo Y; Department of Medical Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
  • Fan Y; Department of Medical Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
  • Chen S; Department of Medical Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
  • Cai R; Department of Medical Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
  • Li Q; Department of Medical Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
  • Han Y; Department of Medical Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
  • Xu H; Department of Medical Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
  • Wang Y; Department of Medical Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
  • Wang J; Department of Medical Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
  • Xu B; Department of Medical Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
J Natl Cancer Cent ; 3(2): 115-120, 2023 Jun.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39035725
ABSTRACT

Background:

This study was conducted to evaluate the efficacy and safety of docetaxel/S-1 (TS) compared with docetaxel/capecitabine (TX) as a first-line treatment for advanced breast cancer.

Methods:

Patients with advanced metastatic breast cancer were randomly divided into the TS group (n = 54) and the TX group (n = 57) for first-line chemotherapy from August 2015 to April 2019 (ClinicalTrials.org registration no. NCT02947061). Following the completion of combination therapy, patients without progression received S-1 or capecitabine maintenance treatment. The primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS).

Results:

Among 111 enrolled patients, the median PFS did not differ significantly between the TS group and the TX group (TS vs. TX, 9.0 vs. 7.4 months, P = 0.365, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.50-1.11, hazard ratio [HR] 0.75). There was also no statistically significant difference in median overall survival (OS) between the two groups (TS vs. TX, 40.2 vs. 41.3 months, P = 0.976). In addition, visceral metastasis and metastasis sites, such as the liver or lung, did not lead to a significant effect on PFS and OS. The two regimens showed no significant difference in adverse events, except hand-foot syndrome, which predominated in the TX group (38.6% vs. 7.4%, P = 0.001), and diarrhea (24.1% vs. 3.6%, P = 0.003) and elevation of aspartate aminotransferase (AST)/alanine aminotransferase (ALT) levels (14.8% vs. 3.5%, P = 0.049), which were more frequent in the TS group.

Conclusions:

The TS and TX regimens demonstrated similar efficacy and safety for the first-line treatment of advanced breast cancer. The TS regimen had fewer cases of severe hand-foot syndrome than the TX regimen, representing an effective alternative option to the TX regimen. Further studies are warranted to define the efficacy and safety of this strategy in real-world settings.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article