Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Safety of teplizumab in patients with high-risk for diabetes mellitus type 1: A systematic review.
Buddhavarapu, Venkata; Dhillon, Gagandeep; Grewal, Harpreet; Sharma, Pranjal; Kashyap, Rahul; Surani, Salim.
Afiliação
  • Buddhavarapu V; Department of Medicine, Banner Baywood Medical Center, Banner Health, Mesa, AZ 85206, United States.
  • Dhillon G; Department of Medicine, UM Baltimore Washington Medical Center, Glen Burnie, MD 21061, United States.
  • Grewal H; Department of Radiology, Ascension Sacred Heart Hospital, Pensacola, FL 32504, United States.
  • Sharma P; Department of Medicine, Northeast Ohio Medical Center, Rootstown, OH 44272, United States.
  • Kashyap R; Department of Research, Wellspan Health, York, PA 17403, United States.
  • Surani S; Anesthesiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, United States.
World J Diabetes ; 15(8): 1793-1801, 2024 Aug 15.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39192866
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

The incidence of diabetes mellitus type 1 (DM1) has been rising worldwide because of improvements in diagnostic techniques and improved access to care in countries with lower socioeconomic status. A new anti-CD4 antibody, Tep-lizumab, has been shown to delay the progression of DM1 and is the only medication approved for this indication. However, more information is needed about the safety profile of this drug.

AIM:

To identify the odds ratios (OR) of systems-based adverse effects for Teplizumab when compared to Placebo.

METHODS:

An extensive systematic review was conducted from the inception of the medication until December 31, 2023. All clinical trials and studies that evaluated Teplizumab vs placebo were included in the initial review. The study protocol was designed using Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines guidelines and was registered in PROSPERO (ID CRD42024496169). Crude OR were generated using RevMan Software version 5.4.

RESULTS:

After screening and review, 5 studies were selected to determine the risk of adverse effects of teplizumab compared to placebo. A total of 561 patients were included in the study population. Total adverse effects and system-based adverse effects were studied and reported. We determined that patients receiving Teplizumab had a higher risk of developing gastrointestinal (GI) (OR = 1.60, 95%CI 1.01-2.52, P = 0.04), dermatological (OR = 6.33, 95%CI 4.05-9.88, P < 0.00001) and hematological adverse effects (OR = 19.03, 95%CI 11.09-32.66, P < 0.00001). These patients were also significantly likely to have active Epstein-Barr Virus infection (OR = 3.16, 95%CI 1.51-6.64, P < 0.002). While our data showed that patients receiving Teplizumab did have a higher incidence of total adverse effects vs placebo, this finding did not reach statistical significance (OR = 2.25, 95%CI 0.80-6.29, P = 0.12).

CONCLUSION:

Our systematic review suggests that Teplizumab patients are at risk for significant adverse effects, primarily related to GI, dermatological, and hematological systems. The total adverse effect data is limited as study populations are small. More studies should be conducted on this medication to better inform the target population of potential adverse effects.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article