A randomized, prospective, two-center comparison of sirolimus-eluting stent and zotarolimus-eluting stent in acute ST-elevation myocardial infarction: the SEZE trial / 中华医学杂志(英文版)
Chinese Medical Journal
; (24): 3373-3381, 2012.
Article
em En
| WPRIM
| ID: wpr-316503
Biblioteca responsável:
WPRO
ABSTRACT
<p><b>BACKGROUND</b>The zotarolimus-eluting stent has shown larger in-stent late lumen loss compared to sirolimus-eluting stents in previous studies. However, this has not been thoroughly evaluated in ST elevation myocardial infarction.</p><p><b>METHODS</b>This was a prospective, randomized, controlled trial evaluating angiographic outcomes in patients presenting with ST elevation myocardial infarction, treated with zotarolimus-eluting stents or sirolimus-eluting stents. From March 2007 to February 2009, 122 patients were randomized to zotarolimus-eluting stents or sirolimus-eluting stents in a 11 fashion. The primary endpoint was 9-month in-stent late lumen loss confirmed by coronary angiography, and secondary endpoints were percent diameter stenosis, binary restenosis rate, major adverse cardiac events (a composite of cardiac death, non-fatal myocardial infarction, and target vessel revascularization), and late-acquired incomplete stent apposition.</p><p><b>RESULTS</b>Angiographic in-stent late lumen loss was significantly higher in the zotarolimus-eluting stent group compared to the sirolimus-eluting stent group ((0.49 ± 0.65) mm vs. (0.10 ± 0.46) mm, P = 0.001). Percent diameter stenosis at 9-month follow-up was also larger in the zotarolimus-eluting stent group ((30.0 ± 17.9)% vs. (17.6 ± 14.0)%, P < 0.001). In-segment analysis showed similar findings. There were no significant differences in binary restenosis rate, major adverse cardiac events, and late-acquired incomplete stent apposition.</p><p><b>CONCLUSIONS</b>Compared to sirolimus-eluting stents, the zotarolimus-eluting stent is associated with significantly higher in-stent late lumen loss at 9-month angiographic follow-up in the treatment of ST elevation myocardial infarction. Although there was no significant difference in 1-year clinical outcomes, the clinical implication of increased late lumen loss should be further studied.</p>
Texto completo:
1
Base de dados:
WPRIM
Tipo de estudo:
Clinical_trials
Limite:
Aged
/
Female
/
Humans
/
Male
Idioma:
En
Ano de publicação:
2012
Tipo de documento:
Article