Supercharged end-to-side anterior interosseous nerve transfer to restore intrinsic function in high ulnar nerve injury: a prospective cohort study.

BACKGROUND: High ulnar nerve injuries is known to have unfavorable motor outcomes compared to other peripheral nerve injuries in the upper extremity. Functional muscle recovery after peripheral nerve injury depends on the time to motor end plate reinnervation and the number of motor axons that successfully reach the target muscle. The purpose of this study is to assess the functional recovery, and complications following performing supercharge end-to-side (SETS) anastomosis for proximal ulnar nerve injuries. Our study focuses on the role of SETS in the recovery process of high ulnar nerve injury. PATIENT AND METHODS: This study is a prospective, single-arm, open-label, case series. The original proximal nerve pathology was dealt with according to the cause of injury, then SETS was performed distally. The follow-up period was 18 months. We compared the neurological findings before and after the procedure. A new test was used to show the effect of SETS on recovery by performing a Lidocaine proximal ulnar nerve block test. RESULTS: Recovery of the motor function of the ulnar nerve was evident in 33 (86.8%) patients. The mean time to intrinsic muscle recovery was 6.85 months ± 1.3, only 11.14% of patients restored protective sensation to the palm and finger and 86.8% showed sensory level at the wrist level at the end of the follow-up period. Lidocaine block test was performed on 35 recovered patients and showed no change in intrinsic hand function in 31 patients. CONCLUSION: SETS exhibit a remarkable role in the treatment of high ulnar nerve damage. SETS transfer can act as a nerve transfer that can supply intrinsic muscles by its fibers and allows for proximal nerve regeneration. We believe that this technique improves recovery of hand motor function and allows recovery of sensory fibers when combined with treating the proximal lesion. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Approved by Research Ethics Committee of Faculty of Medicine- Cairo University on 01/09/2021 with code number: MD-215-2021.

Functional and radiological outcomes of dynamic hip screw with trochanteric stabilizing plate versus short proximal femoral nail in management of unstable trochanteric fractures: A randomized-controlled trial.

OBJECTIVES: This study aims to compare dynamic hip screw (DHS) with trochanteric stabilizing plate (TSP) versus short proximal femoral nail (PFN) in unstable trochanteric fractures in terms of the functional and radiological outcomes. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between June 2019 and March 2020, a total of 68 patients (32 males, 36 females; mean age: 69.7±8.2 years; range, 60 to 88 years) with unstable trochanteric fractures were included in this randomized-controlled trial. Eligible patients were randomized to undergo DHS with TSP (n=34) or short PFN (n=34) and followed for 12 months. The outcome measures including Harris Hip Score (HHS), operating room time, the amount of blood loss and need for intraoperative transfusion, return to activity, time to union, postoperative complications, failure rate, and mortality rate were analyzed. RESULTS: The mean operative time in the DHS+TSP group was 105±10 min, while in the PFN group it was 94±8 min (p=0.001). The mean time until union in the DHS+TSP group was 10.1±1.9 weeks, while in the PFN group, it was 8.8±1.8 weeks (p=0.008). The mean time to return to the pre-fracture activity level in the DHS+TSP group was 12.6±2.6 weeks, while in the PFN group, it was 10.8±2.1 weeks (p=0.005). The mean HHS for the DHS+TPS group was 77.9±8.4, while for the PFN group, it was 80.4±8.7 (p=0.26). There was no significant difference in the walking capability between the two groups. One-year mortality rate was 29.4% in the PFN group and 17.6% in the DHS+TSP group (p=0.284), indicating no significant difference. Mechanical failure was recorded in three cases (8.8%) in the DHS+TSP group compared to two cases (5.8%) in the PFN group with no statistically significant difference. These five cases needed later revisions with total hip replacement. CONCLUSION: The use of PFN in unstable trochanteric fractures was associated with a shorter time until union and a faster return to the pre-fracture level of activity than the DHS+TSP group. Postoperative hip function, walking independence, as well as complication and one-year mortality rates were comparable.