The use of sleep measures to compare a new 5HT1A agonist with buspirone in humans.

The partial agonist buspirone has a REM (rapid eye movement) suppressing effect on human sleep probably via a 5HT(1A) receptor in the pontine area. Eptapirone is a new 5HT(1A) agonist with a greater intrinsic effect than buspirone. The objective of this study was to examine the effects of eptapirone on sleep architecture, particularly REM sleep, in normal volunteers and compare it with buspirone and placebo. This was a randomized, double-blind placebo-controlled four-way crossover study in 12 healthy volunteers. Volunteers were screened to ensure that they had normal overnight sleep EEG (electroencephalogram) and were extensive CYP 2D6 metabolizers. Sleep was recorded on pairs of nights on four occasions, with medication being taken before the second night. Treatments were eptapirone 1.5mg at 10 AM, eptapirone 1.5mg at 11 PM, buspirone 20mg at 11 PM and placebo. Standard measures of sleep were derived and compared among the four treatments using ANOVA. REM sleep was significantly suppressed supporting the proposition that activation of post-synaptic 5HT(1A) receptors reduces REM sleep. Sleep fragmentation increased by both drugs. REM sleep suppression was significantly greater with morning eptapirone than with buspirone. Wakefulness in sleep was significantly greatest after morning eptapirone. REM sleep effects were greatest after evening eptapirone, suggesting a greater effect on central serotonin receptors than that of buspirone.

Tryptophan depletion reverses the therapeutic effect of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors in social anxiety disorder.

BACKGROUND: Tryptophan depletion studies have suggested that central serotonin (5-hydroxytryptamine, 5-HT) function mediates the therapeutic effect of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) in depression and panic disorder. The present study tested the hypothesis that temporary reduction in central 5-HT transmission, through acute tryptophan depletion, could reverse the therapeutic effect of the SSRIs in social anxiety disorder (SAD) patients. METHODS: Fourteen patients with SAD who showed sustained clinical improvement with SSRI treatment underwent tryptophan depletion in a double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover design, over 2 days 1 week apart. At the peak time of depletion, the participants also underwent three behavioral challenges: autobiographical script, verbal task, and neutral script. Psychological outcome was assessed with the Spielberger State Anxiety Inventory (STAI) Form Y-1 and visual analog scales (VAS) measuring anxiety, depression, and somatic symptoms. RESULTS: Anxiety was significantly increased on the depletion day compared with the control day, both on the STAI Form Y-1 and composite VAS score. Furthermore, there was a significant depletion x time interaction, explained mainly by the anxiogenic effect of the autobiographical script. In contrast, the verbal and the neutral tasks failed to differentiate between depletion and placebo. CONCLUSIONS: Tryptophan depletion induced significant increase of anxiety in treated SAD patients, which was more prominent during the recital of an autobiographical script. This finding supports the notion that SSRIs improve social anxiety by increasing 5-HT availability. The autobiographical script seems to be a more robust challenge test for SAD than the stressful verbal task.

Does 5-HT restrain panic? A tryptophan depletion study in panic disorder patients recovered on paroxetine.

The neurobiological basis of panic disorder has not been clearly established, although a role for serotonin (5-HT) has been postulated. It is clear that drugs which increase 5-HT neurotransmission are effective in treating the condition but how they do so remains a point of debate. The aim of this study was to determine if lowering brain serotonin activity using the technique of tryptophan depletion provoked a short-term relapse of panic symptoms in patients with panic disorder who had responded to drug treatment. Fourteen patients with panic disorder who had responded to treatment with the selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI) paroxetine received a tryptophan-free amino acid drink on one occasion and a control drink on the other in a double-blind crossover design. In addition, they received an infusion of flumazenil (used as a pharmacological challenge) and placebo on each day. The tryptophan depleted drink produced an 87% reduction in plasma tryptophan concentration. Flumazenil produced a panic attack (defined by changes in the panic inventory) in seven out of 14 patients when tryptophan depleted and one out of 14 on the control day (p < 0.02). Three patients also experienced temporary depressive symptoms when tryptophan depleted, with no mood changes being seen on the control days. We conclude that rapid lowering of brain serotonin function can allow the precipitation of panic symptoms in response to flumazenil in panic disorder patients who have responded to treatment with an SSRI. This implies that in panic disorder increased 5-HT availability is important in maintaining the response to SSRIs.

Rapid tryptophan depletion following cognitive behavioural therapy for panic disorder.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to examine the effect of rapid tryptophan depletion (RTD) combined with a panicogenic challenge in patients with panic disorder who had responded to treatment with cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT). We hypothesised that RTD (compared with the control drink) would result in an increase in anxiety symptoms when provoked by a panicogenic challenge with the benzodiazepine antagonist, flumazenil. METHODS: Nine patients with panic disorder who had responded to CBT received a tryptophan-free amino acid drink on one occasion and a control drink on the other in a double-blind crossover design. In addition, they received flumazenil and placebo infusions on each day. RESULTS: Our hypothesis regarding the effects of RTD was supported by findings of a significant interaction between RTD and flumazenil on measures from visual analogues scales (total) and the Spielberger State Anxiety inventory. A somewhat unexpected finding was that in this group of CBT responders, the panicogenic effect of flumazenil was not completely blocked by treatment. This meant that although four of the nine subjects (44%) reported a panicogenic effect of flumazenil on the RTD day, this was not significantly different from the rate of panic attacks in response to flumazenil on the control day. CONCLUSION: We suggest that the partial return of symptoms in response to flumazenil reflects a vulnerability to RTD in this group of panic disorder patients who had responded to treatment with CBT.