Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros

Banco de datos
Tipo del documento
Publication year range
1.
J Int Oral Health ; 7(1): 44-7, 2015 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25709367

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: To assess the association of periodontal status of the patients with and without orthodontic treatment. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This cross-sectional study was conducted among 520 patients (220 undergoing orthodontic procedure and 300 non-orthodontic patients). Periodontal health status was assessed using community periodontal index and loss of attachment. Data were analyzed using SPSS version 16 and level of significance used was 5% level. RESULT: Overall mean number of segments for bleeding component (Score 1) was 0.86 ± 0.708, that of calculus (Score 2) 0.30 ± 0.460, for shallow pockets (4-5 mm) (Score 3) 0.33 ± 0.744 and for deep pockets (6 mm or more) (Score 4) 0.38 ± 0.476. Patients with orthodontic appliances had poor periodontal status than the non-orthodontic patients (P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Patients undergoing orthodontic treatment have increased the level of periodontal status as it leads to more retention of food debris. Hence, these patients should be motivated to maintain good oral hygiene.

2.
J Clin Diagn Res ; 9(6): ZC20-2, 2015 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26266210

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: The study was done to determine the quantity of orthodontics and the type of appliance used for orthodontic treatment by general dentist. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 410 dentists completely participated in the study. The study included questions to know the positive effects of orthodontic treatment done by general dentists and their opinions and qualities regarding the provision of treatment. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: Statistical analysis was done using SPSS version of 16.0 was used at p ≤ 0.05. RESULTS: One forty six (35.6%) dentists answered that they practice orthodontic treatment to their patients, of which most were providing removable appliances (39.5%). There was a significant difference between the groups toward the benefits of orthodontic treatment according to experience of service and locality. General dentist were providing this treatment mainly in the mixed dentition period i.e. 96(65.8%). Most of the participants gave positive response regarding expansion of their syllabus related to orthodontics. CONCLUSION: A significant difference in response to the benefits of the treatment were seen according to experience and are of practice and most of the participants showed positive response increasing their courses in orthodontics at undergraduate level.

SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
Detalles de la búsqueda