Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
1.
Ophthalmology ; 114(10): 1904-11, 2007 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17532046

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: To report the initial diagnosis of leprosy in patients seeking treatment from an ophthalmologist in a tertiary eye care center, its confirmation by histopathologic and polymerase chain reaction analysis, and review of literature. DESIGN: Noncomparative retrospective case series. PARTICIPANTS: Patients with no known history of leprosy who were selected based on either a clinical suspicion or a histopathologic diagnosis and were found to have ocular or periocular lesions suggestive of leprosy. METHODS: Review of clinical records of patients with no known history of leprosy seen by an ophthalmologist at a tertiary eye care referral center. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Patient demographics, presenting symptoms and signs, diagnostic studies, complications, and treatment. RESULTS: Among the 6 patients (5 women and 1 man; average age, 55 years), only 2 were found to have leprosy from clinical examination alone. Histopathologic characteristics or demonstration of acid-fast bacilli, suggestive of leprosy, were found in 5 patients. Definite confirmation of leprosy was made by polymerase chain reaction performed on formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissues of 4 patients having suspected leprosy based on clinicohistopathologic examination results. CONCLUSIONS: The diagnosis of leprosy relies on the clinical symptom complex, epidemiologic factors, and demonstration of acid-fast bacilli in the tissue sample. Considering that the global leprosy population is 12 million, a patient with leprosy may be found anywhere. The ophthalmologist may be the first one to encounter such patient, in which case suspicion and detection of ocular findings may lead to early treatment of the infection. Polymerase chain reaction may be a new tool in the definite diagnosis of leprosy when suspicion of the diseases is raised by clinicohistopathologic studies.


Asunto(s)
Infecciones Bacterianas del Ojo/diagnóstico , Lepra/diagnóstico , Mycobacterium leprae/aislamiento & purificación , Adulto , Anciano , Cartilla de ADN/química , ADN Bacteriano/análisis , Infecciones Bacterianas del Ojo/tratamiento farmacológico , Infecciones Bacterianas del Ojo/microbiología , Femenino , Humanos , Leprostáticos/uso terapéutico , Lepra/tratamiento farmacológico , Lepra/microbiología , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Mycobacterium leprae/genética , Oftalmología , Reacción en Cadena de la Polimerasa , Estudios Retrospectivos
2.
Cornea ; 25(1): 123-5, 2006 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16331055

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To demonstrate the potential value of obtaining routine fungal cultures of donor rims at the time of corneal transplantation and instituting prophylactic therapy in culture-positive cases, even in the absence of clinical evidence of established microbial keratitis or endophthalmitis. METHODS: Interventional case report and literature review. RESULTS: A 69-year-old Saudi man underwent penetrating keratoplasty with donor tissue that was culture-positive for Candida glabrata. The postoperative course was complicated by slight override of the graft associated with an associated epithelial defect, but there was no evidence of microbial keratitis or significant anterior chamber inflammation. Following repair of the graft override on postoperative day 42, the epithelial defect healed. The subsequent clinical course was unremarkable until postoperative day 146, when a deep stromal infiltrate was present at the graft-host junction, associated with a dense endothelial plaque. Cultures of the anterior chamber were positive for Candida glabrata. Treatment with topical and intracameral amphotericin B and systemic fluconazole, along with topical corticosteroids and intracameral t-PA, was successful in eradicating the corneal infiltrate and resolving intraocular inflammation. Four months after treatment was initiated, there was no evidence of recurrent fungal keratitis or endophthalmitis. CONCLUSION: This case provides support for the practice of obtaining routine fungal cultures of donor rims at the time of corneal transplantation and for the implementation of prophylactic antifungal therapy in culture-positive cases.


Asunto(s)
Candida glabrata/aislamiento & purificación , Candidiasis/transmisión , Úlcera de la Córnea/microbiología , Transmisión de Enfermedad Infecciosa , Infecciones Fúngicas del Ojo/transmisión , Queratoplastia Penetrante/efectos adversos , Anciano , Anfotericina B/uso terapéutico , Cámara Anterior/microbiología , Candidiasis/microbiología , Candidiasis/terapia , Córnea/microbiología , Úlcera de la Córnea/tratamiento farmacológico , Quimioterapia Combinada , Endoftalmitis/tratamiento farmacológico , Endoftalmitis/microbiología , Infecciones Fúngicas del Ojo/tratamiento farmacológico , Infecciones Fúngicas del Ojo/microbiología , Fluconazol/uso terapéutico , Humanos , Masculino , Donantes de Tejidos , Activador de Tejido Plasminógeno/uso terapéutico
3.
Saudi J Ophthalmol ; 24(1): 31-3, 2010 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23960871

RESUMEN

Ocular tuberculosis is not uncommon ocular presentation in our community nowadays. Rare presentations described mainly in the immunocompromised patients. The diagnosis of ocular TB is presumed in the vast majority of the cases of the intraocular TB. We are presenting a very rare presentation of definitive intraocular TB in a healthy 24-year-old male.

SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
Detalles de la búsqueda